Electoral System, Party Politics and Legislative Candidate Selection in Taiwan

被引:0
作者
Yu, Eric Chen-hua
Yu, Ching-hsin
机构
来源
DEMOCRACY AND DEVELOPMENT: TAIWAN AND THE BALTIC COUNTRIES IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE | 2012年
关键词
electoral system; Mixed-Member Majoritarian System; single-member districts; candidate selection mechanism; polling primary; election machine; NONTRANSFERABLE VOTE; COMPETITION; SINGLE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Taiwan has adopted a form of Mixed-Member Majoritarian (MMM) system for the Legislative Yuan (parliament) elections since 2008. Among the total 113 seats, 73 seats are elected from single member districts, 34 seats are elected via proportional party lists, and six seats are reserved for two aboriginal districts. As the new electoral system has a high proportion of single member districts (SMD: 64.6%), it tends to favour a two-party competition asserted by the the Duverger's Law. In order to obtain a majority in the parliament, it is important for the two major parties, the Kuomington (KNIT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), to select electable candidates who can compete in those normally one-on-one single member districts. This paper analyzes how the two major parties faced the challenge brought by the new electoral system. Specifically, it focuses on why and how both the KMT and DPP adopted a new candidate selection mechanism - namely, the polling primary, in order to strengthen/maintain their competitiveness under the current electoral system. We argue that the new candidate selection mechanism developed by the two major parties could be the best way for them to not only reconcile their intra-party competitions for nomination, but also help them choose electable candidates in the hope of winning the election. In short, the two major parties in Taiwan may soon become a truly election machine.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 175
页数:14
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, COMMUNICATION
[2]   An empirical theory of rational nominating behaviour applied to Japanese district elections [J].
Browne, EC ;
Patterson, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 29 :259-289
[3]   SEAT BONUSES UNDER THE SINGLE NONTRANSFERABLE VOTE SYSTEM - EVIDENCE FROM JAPAN AND TAIWAN [J].
COX, GW ;
NIOU, E .
COMPARATIVE POLITICS, 1994, 26 (02) :221-236
[4]   The cost of intraparty competition - The single, nontransferable vote and money politics in Japan [J].
Cox, GW ;
Thies, MF .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 1998, 31 (03) :267-291
[5]   THE ELECTORAL FORTUNES OF LEGISLATIVE FACTIONS IN JAPAN [J].
COX, GW ;
ROSENBLUTH, F .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1993, 87 (03) :577-589
[6]  
Crotty W., 1985, PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARI
[7]  
Curtis G.L., 1971, ELECTION CAMPAIGNING
[8]  
Duverger M., 1994, POLITICAL PARTIES TH
[9]  
Gallagher Michael., 1988, The Secret Garden of Politics. Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective
[10]  
HUANG TF, 1995, ISSUES STUD, V31, P91