Energy consumption and Sustainable Economic Welfare in G7 countries; A comparison with the conventional nexus

被引:66
作者
Menegaki, Angeliki N. [1 ,2 ]
Tugcu, Can Tansel [3 ]
机构
[1] Hellen Open Univ, Parodos Aristotelous 18, Patras 26335, Greece
[2] Org Georgikon Asfaliseon, Reg Branch Eastern Macedonia & Thrace, Komotini 69100, Greece
[3] Akdeniz Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Antalya, Turkey
关键词
Economic growth; Energy consumption; G7; countries; Sustainability; Welfare; NUCLEAR-ENERGY; GROWTH NEXUS; METHODOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP; ERROR-CORRECTION; OECD COUNTRIES; ISEW; INDEX; GPI; GDP;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.133
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This is an empirical study on the causal relationship between sustainable economic welfare growth and energy consumption for Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, UK and the USA using a multivariate panel framework with variables such as employment, capital, energy consumption and R & D. The short and long run relationships are compared with those produced from the commonly known so far, energy-GDP (Gross Domestic Product) growth relationship. Results mainly show that in the long-run, G7 economies can reduce energy consumption without compromising sustainable economic welfare. In the short-run though, both GDP and economic welfare are very much dependent on energy consumption for their materialization of growth, sustainable or not. The current paper follows the tendency of New Economics that shift their focus therein and propagate the use of sustainable welfare in place of the criticized GDP. The calculation of the Index for Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) reveals that UK, closely followed by USA, have the largest gap (on average 52% and 50% respectively) between their GDP and sustainable economic welfare. Japan is experiencing a steadily widening gap, while Canada is the most sustainable country among G7.
引用
收藏
页码:892 / 901
页数:10
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Testing the relationships between energy consumption and income in G7 countries with nonlinear causality tests [J].
Ajmi, Ahdi Noomen ;
El Montasser, Ghassen ;
Duc Khuong Nguyen .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2013, 35 :126-133
[2]  
[Anonymous], INT J SUSTAIN ENERGY
[3]   Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption-growth nexus: Evidence from a panel error correction model [J].
Apergis, Nicholas ;
Payne, James E. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 (03) :733-738
[4]   Methodological developments in US state-level Genuine Progress Indicators: Toward GPI 2.0 [J].
Bagstad, Kenneth J. ;
Berik, Guenseli ;
Gaddis, Erica J. Brown .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 45 :474-485
[5]   A comparison between GDP and ISEW in decoupling analysis [J].
Beca, Pedro ;
Santos, Rui .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 46 :167-176
[6]   Measuring sustainable welfare: A new approach to the ISEW [J].
Beca, Pedro ;
Santos, Rui .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (04) :810-819
[7]  
Bildirici ME, 2012, J ENERGY SOUTH AFR, V23, P29
[8]   The relationship between economic growth and biomass energy consumption in some European countries [J].
Bildirici, Melike E. ;
Ozaksoy, Fulya .
JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2013, 5 (02)
[9]   Proposed changes to the index of sustainable economic welfare: An application to Belgium [J].
Bleys, Brent .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 64 (04) :741-751
[10]   Barriers and opportunities for alternative measures of economic welfare [J].
Bleys, Brent ;
Whitby, Alistair .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 117 :162-172