Does media use lead to cyberbullying or vice versa? Testing longitudinal associations using a latent cross-lagged panel design

被引:19
作者
Hiller, Christin R. [1 ]
Pfetsch, Jan [1 ]
Schultze-Krumbholz, Anja [1 ]
Ittel, Angela [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Dept Educ Psychol, Inst Educ, MAR 2-6,Marchstr 23, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Cyberbullying; Cybervictimization; Media use; Cross-lagged panel model; Longitudinal; VIOLENT VIDEO GAMES; INTERNET USE; FIT INDEXES; CYBER; RISK; COMMUNICATION; METAANALYSIS; AGGRESSION; BEHAVIOR; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.007
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Cyberbullying research has repeatedly demonstrated that the frequency of media use is a cross-sectional risk factor of cyberbullying and cybervictimization. However, we do not yet know whether the frequency of media use is also a longitudinal risk factor or an outcome of cyberbullying and cybervictimization, or both. Thus, the present study examines the reciprocal associations between the frequency of media use, cyberbullying and cybervictimization over 15 months using a latent cross-lagged panel design. The participants were 1199 German school students aged 9-17 years (M = 12.01 years, SD = 1.68, 55% female). The frequency of media use, cyberbullying and cybervictimization, and the control variables traditional bullying, traditional victimization, sex and age were assessed with a self-report questionnaire. The results show that the frequency of media use does not predict cyberbullying and cybervictimization. However, cyberbullying and cybervictimization predict the frequency of media use from the third to the fourth measurement point. Consequently, the frequency of media use is not a longitudinal risk factor but rather an outcome of cyberbullying and cybervictimization at one point in time. This implies that cyberbullying prevention and intervention programs should not focus on the frequency but on the Way media are used. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 101
页数:9
相关论文
共 56 条
[41]   Developmental Trajectories of (Cyber)Bullying Perpetration and Social Intelligence During Early Adolescence [J].
Pabian, Sara ;
Vandebosch, Heidi .
JOURNAL OF EARLY ADOLESCENCE, 2016, 36 (02) :145-170
[42]   Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents [J].
Raskauskas, Juliana ;
Stoltz, Ann D. .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 43 (03) :564-575
[43]  
Schermelleh-Engel K., 2003, METHODS PSYCHOL RES, V8, P23, DOI DOI 10.1002/0470010940
[44]  
Schultze-Krumbholz A., 2011, BERLIN CYBERBU UNPUB
[45]   Social-Behavioral Correlates of Cyberbullying in a German Student Sample [J].
Schultze-Krumbholz, Anja ;
Scheithauer, Herbert .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 217 (04) :224-226
[46]   Online Harassment and Cyberbullying in the Czech Republic Comparison Across Age Groups [J].
Sevcikova, Anna ;
Smahel, David .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 217 (04) :227-229
[47]   Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils [J].
Smith, Peter K. ;
Mahdavi, Jess ;
Carvalho, Manuel ;
Fisher, Sonja ;
Russell, Shanette ;
Tippett, Neil .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 49 (04) :376-385
[48]  
Steffgen G., 2009, PAPER PRESENTED AT T
[49]   Longitudinal Risk Factors for Cyberbullying in Adolescence [J].
Sticca, Fabio ;
Ruggieri, Sabrina ;
Alsaker, Francoise ;
Perren, Sonja .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY & APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 23 (01) :52-67
[50]   Online communication and adolescent relationships [J].
Subrahmanyam, Kaveri ;
Greenfield, Patricia .
FUTURE OF CHILDREN, 2008, 18 (01) :119-146