Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery: Robotic Surgery versus Laparoscopic Procedures

被引:9
作者
Baukloh, Julia-Kristin [1 ]
Perez, Daniel [1 ]
Reeh, Matthias [1 ]
Biebl, Matthias [2 ]
Izbicki, Jakob R. [1 ]
Pratschke, Johann [2 ]
Aigner, Felix [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Gen Visceral & Thorac Surg, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Surg, Campus Mitte & Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Rectal cancer; Minimally invasive surgery; Laparoscopic surgery; Robotic surgery; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; SHORT-TERM-OUTCOMES; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; LOW-RECTAL-CANCER; MRC CLASICC TRIAL; ASSISTED RESECTION; LEARNING-CURVE; PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; COLORECTAL-CANCER; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL;
D O I
10.1159/000486008
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: For a long time, the comprehensive application of minimally invasive techniques in lower gastrointestinal (GI) surgery was substantially impaired by inherent anatomical and technical complexities. Recently, several new techniques such as robotic operating platforms and transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) have revolutionized the minimally invasive approach. This review aims to depict the current state of the art and evaluates the advantages and drawbacks in regard to perioperative outcome and quality of oncological resection. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using the search terms 'colorectal cancer', 'rectal cancer', 'minimally invasive surgery', 'laparoscopic surgery', and 'robotic' to identify relevant studies reporting on robotic surgery (RS) either alone or in comparison to laparoscopic surgery (LS). Publications on taTME were analyzed separately. Results: 69 studies reporting on RS with a total of 20,872 patients, and 17 articles on taTME including 881 patients, were identified. Conclusion: Both RS and taTME can facilitate a minimally invasive approach for lower GI surgery in an increasing number of patients. Furthermore, combining both techniques might become an auspicious approach in selected patients; further prospective and randomized trials are needed to verify its benefits over conventional laTME. (C) 2018 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 22
页数:7
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer [J].
Akiyoshi, Takashi ;
Kuroyanagi, Hiroya ;
Oya, Masatoshi ;
Konishi, Tsuyoshi ;
Fukuda, Meiki ;
Fujimoto, Yoshiya ;
Ueno, Masashi ;
Miyata, Satoshi ;
Yamaguchi, Toshiharu .
SURGERY, 2009, 146 (03) :483-489
[2]   Robotic-Assisted Surgery Improves the Quality of Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer Compared to Laparoscopy: Results of a Case-Controlled Analysis [J].
Allemann, Pierre ;
Duvoisin, Celine ;
Di Mare, Luca ;
Huebner, Martin ;
Demartines, Nicolas ;
Hahnloser, Dieter .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 40 (04) :1010-1016
[3]   Laparoscopic right colectomy reduces short-term mortality and morbidity. Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Arezzo, Alberto ;
Passera, Roberto ;
Ferri, Valentina ;
Gonella, Federica ;
Cirocchi, Roberto ;
Morino, Mario .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 30 (11) :1457-1472
[4]   Assessment of a flexible robotic system for endoluminal applications and transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME): Could this be the solution we have been searching for? [J].
Atallah, S. .
TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2017, 21 (10) :809-814
[5]   Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision: a pilot study [J].
Atallah, S. ;
Martin-Perez, B. ;
Pinan, J. ;
Quinteros, F. ;
Schoonyoung, H. ;
Albert, M. ;
Larach, S. .
TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2014, 18 (11) :1047-1053
[6]   Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TAMIS-TME): results and experience with the first 20 patients undergoing curative-intent rectal cancer surgery at a single institution [J].
Atallah, S. ;
Martin-Perez, B. ;
Albert, M. ;
deBeche-Adams, T. ;
Nassif, G. ;
Hunter, L. ;
Larach, S. .
TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2014, 18 (05) :473-480
[7]   Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excison of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial [J].
Baik, S. H. ;
Ko, Y. T. ;
Kang, C. M. ;
Lee, W. J. ;
Kim, N. K. ;
Sohn, S. K. ;
Chi, H. S. ;
Cho, C. H. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (07) :1601-1608
[8]   Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer: Short-Term Outcome of a Prospective Comparative Study [J].
Baik, Seung Hyuk ;
Kwon, Hye Youn ;
Kim, Jin Soo ;
Hur, Hyuk ;
Sohn, Seung Kook ;
Cho, Chang Hwan ;
Kim, Hoguen .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (06) :1480-1487
[9]   Evaluation of the robotic approach concerning pitfalls in rectal surgery [J].
Baukloh, J. K. ;
Reeh, M. ;
Spinoglio, G. ;
Corratti, A. ;
Bartolini, I. ;
Mirasolo, V. M. ;
Priora, F. ;
Izbicki, J. R. ;
Gomez Fleitas, M. ;
Gomez Ruiz, M. ;
Perez, D. R. .
EJSO, 2017, 43 (07) :1304-1311
[10]   Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes [J].
Bianchi, P. P. ;
Ceriani, C. ;
Locatelli, A. ;
Spinoglio, G. ;
Zampino, M. G. ;
Sonzogni, A. ;
Crosta, C. ;
Andreoni, B. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (11) :2888-2894