Tissue-based predictors of germ-line BRCA1 mutations: implications for triaging of genetic testing

被引:4
作者
de la Cruz, Jeannine [5 ]
Andre, Fabrice [5 ]
Harrell, Robyn K. [4 ]
Bassett, Roland L., Jr. [4 ]
Arun, Banu [3 ]
Mathieu, Marie-Christine [2 ]
Delaloge, Suzette [5 ]
Gilcrease, Michael Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Inst Gustave Roussy, Dept Pathol, F-94805 Villejuif, France
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Breast Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Inst Gustave Roussy, Dept Med, F-94805 Villejuif, France
关键词
Breast; BRCA1; Mutation; Estrogen receptor; Mitotic rate; CANCER-SUSCEPTIBILITY GENES; HEREDITARY BREAST-CANCER; OVARIAN-CANCER; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; RISK; PATHOLOGY; CARRIERS; WOMEN; INDIVIDUALS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.humpath.2012.02.002
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
BRCA testing of patients with breast cancer considered at high risk for having a germ-line BRCA mutation usually consists of comprehensive mutational analysis of both BRCA1 and BRCA2. A more cost-effective strategy of triaging patients for analysis of a single gene could be adopted if tissue-based predictors indicated a high risk specifically for either BRA I or BRCA2. To identify potentially useful tissue-based predictors of BRCA mutation status in breast cancer, we evaluated multiple histopathologic features of invasive breast carcinoma on archival tissue sections from 196 high-risk patients who had undergone BRCA testing, and we analyzed which individual or combination of features was most associated with BRCA mutations. Of the 196 patients with invasive breast carcinoma, there were 44 (22%) with a deleterious BRCA1 mutation and 27 (14%) with a deleterious BRCA2 mutation. For patients with available untreated surgical resection specimens for evaluation (n = 172), estrogen receptor positive phenotype was inversely associated with the presence of a BRCA1 mutation (odds ratio, 0.243; 95% confidence interval, 0.070-0.840; P = .025), and high mitotic activity (>= 25 mitotic figures per 10 high-power fields) was directly associated with the presence of a BRCA1 mutation (odds ratio, 4.222; 95% confidence interval, 1.353-13.18; P = .013). The combination of estrogen receptor negative phenotype and high mitotic rate had high specificity (99%; 95% confidence interval, 95%-100%) but low sensitivity (43%; 95% confidence interval, 26%-61%) for identifying a deleterious BRCA I mutation. In patients with breast cancer at high risk for carrying a BRCA mutation, those with estrogen receptor negative phenotype and high mitotic rate could be triaged specifically for BRCA I testing instead of initially performing mutational analysis for both BRCA1 and BRCA2. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1932 / 1939
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibition: "Targeted" Therapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer [J].
Anders, Carey K. ;
Winer, Eric P. ;
Ford, James M. ;
Dent, Rebecca ;
Silver, Daniel P. ;
Sledge, George W. ;
Carey, Lisa A. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 16 (19) :4702-4710
[2]   Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history:: A combined analysis of 22 studies [J].
Antoniou, A ;
Pharoah, PDP ;
Narod, S ;
Risch, HA ;
Eyfjord, JE ;
Hopper, JL ;
Loman, N ;
Olsson, H ;
Johannsson, O ;
Borg, Å ;
Pasini, B ;
Radice, P ;
Manoukian, S ;
Eccles, DM ;
Tang, N ;
Olah, E ;
Anton-Culver, H ;
Warner, E ;
Lubinski, J ;
Gronwald, J ;
Gorski, B ;
Tulinius, H ;
Thorlacius, S ;
Eerola, H ;
Nevanlinna, H ;
Syrjäkoski, K ;
Kallioniemi, OP ;
Thompson, D ;
Evans, C ;
Peto, J ;
Lalloo, F ;
Evans, DG ;
Easton, DF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 72 (05) :1117-1130
[3]   The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers: updates and extensions [J].
Antoniou, A. C. ;
Cunningham, A. P. ;
Peto, J. ;
Evans, D. G. ;
Lalloo, F. ;
Narod, S. A. ;
Risch, H. A. ;
Eyfjord, J. E. ;
Hopper, J. L. ;
Southey, M. C. ;
Olsson, H. ;
Johannsson, O. ;
Borg, A. ;
Passini, B. ;
Radice, P. ;
Manoukian, S. ;
Eccles, D. M. ;
Tang, N. ;
Olah, E. ;
Anton-Culver, H. ;
Warner, E. ;
Lubinski, J. ;
Gronwald, J. ;
Gorski, B. ;
Tryggvadottir, L. ;
Syrjakoski, K. ;
Kallioniemi, O-P ;
Eerola, H. ;
Nevanlinna, H. ;
Pharoah, P. D. P. ;
Easton, D. F. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 98 (08) :1457-1466
[4]   BRCA2 mutation-associated breast cancers exhibit a distinguishing phenotype based on morphology and molecular profiles from tissue microarrays [J].
Bane, Anita L. ;
Beck, Jeanne C. ;
Bleiweiss, Ira ;
Buys, Saundra S. ;
Catalano, Edison ;
Daly, Mary B. ;
Giles, Graham ;
Godwin, Andy K. ;
Hibshoosh, Hanina ;
Hopper, John L. ;
John, Esther M. ;
Layfield, Lester ;
Longacre, Teri ;
Miron, Alexander ;
Senie, Rubie ;
Southey, Melissa C. ;
West, Dee W. ;
Whittemore, Alice S. ;
Wu, Hong ;
Andrulis, Irene L. ;
O'Malley, Frances P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2007, 31 (01) :121-128
[5]   BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes [J].
Berry, DA ;
Iversen, ES ;
Gudbjartsson, DF ;
Hiller, EH ;
Garber, JE ;
Peshkin, BN ;
Lerman, C ;
Watson, P ;
Lynch, HT ;
Hilsenbeck, SG ;
Rubinstein, WS ;
Hughes, KS ;
Parmigiani, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (11) :2701-2712
[6]   BRCA1 mutations in women attending clinics that evaluate the risk of breast cancer [J].
Couch, FJ ;
DeShano, ML ;
Blackwood, MA ;
Calzone, K ;
Stopfer, J ;
Campeau, L ;
Ganguly, A ;
Rebbeck, T ;
Weber, BL ;
Jablon, L ;
Cobleigh, MA ;
Hoskins, K ;
Garber, JE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 336 (20) :1409-1415
[7]   Recommendations for medical management of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: The French National Ad Hoc Committee [J].
Eisinger, F ;
Alby, N ;
Bremond, A ;
Dauplat, J ;
Espie, M ;
Janiaud, P ;
Kuttenn, F ;
Lebrun, JP ;
Lefranc, JP ;
Pierret, J ;
Sobol, H ;
Stoppa-Lyonnet, D ;
Thouvenin, D ;
Tristant, H ;
Feingold, J .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1998, 9 (09) :939-950
[8]   A new scoring system for the chances of identifying a BRCA1/2 mutation outperforms existing models including BRCAPRO [J].
Evans, DGR ;
Eccles, DM ;
Rahman, N ;
Young, K ;
Bulman, M ;
Amir, E ;
Shenton, A ;
Howell, A ;
Lalloo, F .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2004, 41 (06) :474-480
[9]   Clinical characteristics of individuals with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2:: Analysis of 10,000 individuals [J].
Frank, TS ;
Deffenbaugh, AM ;
Reid, JE ;
Hulick, M ;
Ward, BE ;
Lingenfelter, B ;
Gumpper, KL ;
Scholl, T ;
Tavtigian, SV ;
Pruss, DR ;
Critchfield, GC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (06) :1480-1490
[10]   Optimal selection of individuals for BRCA mutation testing:: A comparison of available methods [J].
James, PA ;
Doherty, R ;
Harris, M ;
Mukesh, BN ;
Milner, A ;
Young, MA ;
Scott, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (04) :707-715