Calcium antagonists, a useful additional therapy in treatment resistant hypertension: Comparison of felodipine ER and nifedipine Retard by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

被引:1
作者
Dees, A
Hovinga, TKK
Breed, JGS
Verstappen, VMC
Puister, SMT
Meems, L
机构
[1] MARTINI ZIEKENHUIS,DEPT INTERNAL MED,GRONINGEN,NETHERLANDS
[2] ST JAN HOSP,DEPT INTERNAL MED,WEERT,NETHERLANDS
[3] ST MAARTENS GASTHUIS,DEPT INTERNAL MED,VENLO,NETHERLANDS
关键词
ambulatory blood pressure; hypertension; adverse events; felodipine ER; nifedipine Retard;
D O I
10.1016/S0300-2977(96)00077-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of felodipine extended release (ER) 2.5 mg (F2.5) and 5 me (F5) once daily with nifedipine Retard 10 mg (N20) and 20 mg (N40) twice daily as additional therapy in patients who remained hypertensive despite treatment with an ACE-inhibitor, beta-blocker or diuretic, Design and methods: In a multicentre, double-blind parallel study, 61 men and 54 women, aged 35-75, with a supine diastolic blood pressure between 95 and 115 mmHg were randomised to treatment with F2.5, F5, N20 or N40 for 8 weeks, with optional doubling of the dose after 4 weeks. Blood pressure was measured at the office after 0, 4 and 8 weeks and by 24-h ambulatory monitoring (ABPM) after 0 and 4 weeks, Spontaneously reported adverse events and a subjective symptom assessment questionnaire were used for side-effect profiling. Results: Mean office systolic/diastolic blood pressure was clinically relevantly reduced in all treatment groups after 4 weeks by 8/7, 12/9, 11/9 and 18/11 mmHg for F25, F5, N20 and N40, respectively, and after 8 weeks (F2.5-5: 17/11 mmHg; F5-10: 18/14 mmHg; N20-40: 19/14 mmNg; N40-80: 25/14 mmHg) with no statistically significant differences between these groups. The lowest dose of felodipine (F2.5) was the least effective, After 4 weeks the ABPM showed consistent 24-h reductions in blood pressure (4/2: 8/5, 7/5; 10/6 mmHg, respectively) over 24 h for the felodipine ER 5 mg group only and for both nifedipine groups. No statistically significant difference between these groups was found. An office responder does not appear to be identical to an ambulatory one and vice versa. The adverse events, mostly oedema, flushing and headache, were dose-related.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 12
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [21] THE CALCIUM-ANTAGONISTS IN THE 1990S - AN OVERVIEW
    OPARIL, S
    CALHOUN, DA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1991, 4 (07) : S396 - S405
  • [22] Twenty-four-hour antihypertensive efficacy of felodipine 10 mg extended-release: The Italian inter-university study
    Pannarale, G
    Puddu, PE
    Monti, F
    Irace, L
    Bentivoglio, R
    Collauto, F
    Barsotti, T
    Corea, T
    Trevi, G
    Campa, PP
    Jacono, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 27 (02) : 255 - 261
  • [23] LOW-DOSE DRUG-COMBINATION THERAPY - AN ALTERNATIVE FIRST-LINE APPROACH TO HYPERTENSION TREATMENT
    PRISANT, LM
    WEIR, MR
    PAPADEMETRIOU, V
    WEBER, MA
    ADEGBILE, IA
    ALEMAYEHU, D
    LEFKOWITZ, MP
    CARR, AA
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1995, 130 (02) : 359 - 366
  • [24] ONCE-DAILY ANTIHYPERTENSIVE TREATMENT WITH CALCIUM-ANTAGONISTS - UTOPIA OR REALITY
    STAESSEN, JA
    CELIS, H
    THIJS, L
    FAGARD, R
    AMERY, A
    [J]. NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 46 (01) : 15 - 24
  • [25] FELODIPINE - A REVIEW OF THE PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTIC USE OF THE EXTENDED RELEASE FORMULATION IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS
    TODD, PA
    FAULDS, D
    [J]. DRUGS, 1992, 44 (02) : 251 - 277
  • [26] AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE MONITORING IN CLINICAL-TRIALS WITH ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS
    VANDERMEIRACKER, AH
    [J]. NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 46 (02) : 99 - 105
  • [27] VANHAMERSVELT HW, 1995, 7 EUR M HYP MIL 9 12
  • [28] VANLEEUWEN JTM, 1993, J HUM HYPERTENS, V7, P509
  • [29] VANREE JW, 1994, J HYPERTENS S3, V12, pS60
  • [30] RISK STRATIFICATION OF LEFT-VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY IN SYSTEMIC HYPERTENSION USING NONINVASIVE AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE MONITORING
    VERDECCHIA, P
    SCHILLACI, G
    BOLDRINI, F
    GUERRIERI, M
    GATTESCHI, C
    BENEMIO, G
    PORCELLATI, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1990, 66 (05) : 583 - 590