Calcium antagonists, a useful additional therapy in treatment resistant hypertension: Comparison of felodipine ER and nifedipine Retard by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

被引:1
作者
Dees, A
Hovinga, TKK
Breed, JGS
Verstappen, VMC
Puister, SMT
Meems, L
机构
[1] MARTINI ZIEKENHUIS,DEPT INTERNAL MED,GRONINGEN,NETHERLANDS
[2] ST JAN HOSP,DEPT INTERNAL MED,WEERT,NETHERLANDS
[3] ST MAARTENS GASTHUIS,DEPT INTERNAL MED,VENLO,NETHERLANDS
关键词
ambulatory blood pressure; hypertension; adverse events; felodipine ER; nifedipine Retard;
D O I
10.1016/S0300-2977(96)00077-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of felodipine extended release (ER) 2.5 mg (F2.5) and 5 me (F5) once daily with nifedipine Retard 10 mg (N20) and 20 mg (N40) twice daily as additional therapy in patients who remained hypertensive despite treatment with an ACE-inhibitor, beta-blocker or diuretic, Design and methods: In a multicentre, double-blind parallel study, 61 men and 54 women, aged 35-75, with a supine diastolic blood pressure between 95 and 115 mmHg were randomised to treatment with F2.5, F5, N20 or N40 for 8 weeks, with optional doubling of the dose after 4 weeks. Blood pressure was measured at the office after 0, 4 and 8 weeks and by 24-h ambulatory monitoring (ABPM) after 0 and 4 weeks, Spontaneously reported adverse events and a subjective symptom assessment questionnaire were used for side-effect profiling. Results: Mean office systolic/diastolic blood pressure was clinically relevantly reduced in all treatment groups after 4 weeks by 8/7, 12/9, 11/9 and 18/11 mmHg for F25, F5, N20 and N40, respectively, and after 8 weeks (F2.5-5: 17/11 mmHg; F5-10: 18/14 mmHg; N20-40: 19/14 mmNg; N40-80: 25/14 mmHg) with no statistically significant differences between these groups. The lowest dose of felodipine (F2.5) was the least effective, After 4 weeks the ABPM showed consistent 24-h reductions in blood pressure (4/2: 8/5, 7/5; 10/6 mmHg, respectively) over 24 h for the felodipine ER 5 mg group only and for both nifedipine groups. No statistically significant difference between these groups was found. An office responder does not appear to be identical to an ambulatory one and vice versa. The adverse events, mostly oedema, flushing and headache, were dose-related.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 12
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] THE ANTIHYPERTENSIVE EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF A LOW-DOSE COMBINATION OF RAMIPRIL AND FELODIPINE ER IN MILD-TO-MODERATE ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION
    BAINBRIDGE, AD
    MACFADYEN, RJ
    STARK, S
    LEES, KR
    REID, JL
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 36 (04) : 323 - 330
  • [2] BULPITT CJ, 1993, HIGH BLOOD PRESSU S1, V2, P70
  • [3] 24-HOUR BLOOD-PRESSURE MONITORING DURING TREATMENT WITH EXTENDED-RELEASE FELODIPINE VERSUS SLOW-RELEASE NIFEDIPINE - CROSS-OVER STUDY
    CARROLL, J
    SHAMISS, A
    ZEVIN, D
    LEVI, J
    ROSENTHAL, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 26 (06) : 974 - 977
  • [4] CARRUTHERS SG, 1993, CLIN INVEST MED, V16, P386
  • [5] CHEN ST, 1995, DRUG INFORM J, V29, P27
  • [6] CLEMENT DL, 1994, J HYPERTENS, V12, P857
  • [7] DIMENAS E, 1991, EUR J CLIN PHARMACOL, V40, P141
  • [8] FAGAN TC, 1994, CLIN THER, V16, P634
  • [9] FRIMODTMOLLER J, 1989, J HYPERTENS, V7, pS365
  • [10] NIFEDIPINE - DOSE-RELATED INCREASE IN MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY HEART-DISEASE
    FURBERG, CD
    PSATY, BM
    MEYER, JV
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1995, 92 (05) : 1326 - 1331