Selection of optimum biological treatment for coking wastewater using analytic hierarchy process

被引:47
|
作者
Wei, Cong [1 ]
Wei, Jingyue [1 ,2 ]
Kong, Qiaoping [1 ]
Fan, Dan [1 ]
Qiu, Guanglei [1 ]
Feng, Chunhua [1 ]
Li, Fusheng [1 ,2 ]
Preis, Sergei [3 ]
Wei, Chaohai [1 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Sch Environm & Energy, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[2] Gifu Univ, River Basin Res Ctr, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 5011193, Japan
[3] Tallinn Univ Technol, Dept Mat & Environm Technol, EE-19086 Tallinn, Estonia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Coking wastewater; Activated sludge process; Analytical hierarchical process; Multi-criteria decision-making; Comprehensive evaluation; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC-HYDROCARBONS; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; TREATMENT-PLANT; ENERGY; TECHNOLOGIES; REMOVAL; OPTIMIZATION; PHENOL; PAHS; FATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140400
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The design of biological treatment process for the coking wastewater (CW) is complicated since wastewater treatment demand is gradually increasing lacking the systematic strategy in efficiency evaluation and advisable selection. Therefore, this study develops a holistic approach by means of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) that uses numerical representation to rank the preferences of each participating alternatives for evaluation of the advanced biological technologies in CW treatment. Based on survey results, six types reactor combinations were selected as the alternatives, which were further classified as two group according to COD load. The AHP methodology consists of weighting and ranking procedures considering technical, economic, environmental and administration factors defined as criteria layers. Eighteen indicators were chosen as sub-criteria layers. Inclusively beneficial and sustainable biological processes were assessed and ranked along the AHP implementation. The results placed technical indicators to the top position among the criteria layers in the weighting descending order 'technical indicators > economic indicators > environmental indicators > administrative indicators', whereas the weight of indicators in sub-criteria layers fitted in the range of 0.005 to 0.151. The inclusive priority calculation integrating all weight indices of criteria and sub-criteria layers resulted in the anaerobic-anoxic-oxic (A/A/O) combination rising in the hierarchy of the low load group, whereas the oxic-hydrolytic-oxic (O/H/O) process was prioritized in the high load group. The accuracy and objectivity of AHP application was also supported by sensitivity and variability analyses that examines a range for the weights' values and corresponding to alternative scenarios. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Simulation and optimization of a coking wastewater biological treatment process by activated sludge models (ASM)
    Wu, Xiaohui
    Yang, Yang
    Wu, Gaoming
    Mao, Juan
    Zhou, Tao
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 165 : 235 - 242
  • [22] Study of The Treatment of Coking Wastewater by Biological Nitrogen Removal with Physical-Chemical Process
    Ba Ya-er
    Li, Zifu
    MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1-8, 2012, 383-390 : 3729 - 3733
  • [23] Hydrogen energy storage method selection using fuzzy axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process
    Karatas, Mumtaz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (32) : 16227 - 16238
  • [24] Seasonal dynamics of bacterial composition and functions in biological treatment of coking wastewater
    Tan, Zhijie
    Chen, Wenli
    Guo, Ziyu
    Xu, Xingyuan
    Xie, Junting
    Dai, Jiangpeng
    Lin, Yuexia
    Sheng, Binbin
    Preis, Sergei
    Wei, Chaohai
    Zhu, Shuang
    APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 108 (01)
  • [25] Insight into the effects of biological treatment on the binding properties of copper onto dissolved organic matter derived from coking wastewater
    Dai, Benlin
    Peng, Yuyao
    Zhang, Meifeng
    Yang, Meng
    Wu, Yi
    Guo, Xujing
    ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2022, 238
  • [26] Deciding on the priority of process parameters using the analytical hierarchy process in electrochemical wastewater treatment and investigation of paint wastewater treatability
    Apaydin, Omer
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2024, 320
  • [27] Acute toxicity and chemical evaluation of coking wastewater under biological and advanced physicochemical treatment processes
    Ma Dehua
    Liu Cong
    Zhu Xiaobiao
    Liu Rui
    Chen Lujun
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2016, 23 (18) : 18343 - 18352
  • [28] Adsorptive treatment of coking wastewater using raw coal fly ash: Adsorption kinetic, thermodynamics and regeneration by Fenton process
    Wang, Nannan
    Zhao, Qiang
    Xu, Han
    Niu, Wanyu
    Ma, Liang
    Lan, Dongcheng
    Hao, Linlin
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2018, 210 : 624 - 632
  • [29] Operation optimization of ammonia nitrogen removal process in coking wastewater treatment
    Zhao, Yuehong
    Liao, Mingsen
    Ning, Pengge
    Cao, Hongbin
    Wen, Hao
    12TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PROCESS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND 25TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, PT C, 2015, 37 : 2519 - 2524
  • [30] Advanced treatment of coking wastewater by oxidation process using pyrite and hydrogen peroxide
    Zhang, Zhiyong
    Wu, Deli
    ADVANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, PTS 1-6, 2013, 726-731 : 2521 - 2525