Randomized clinical study for assessment of incision characteristics and pain associated with LESS versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy

被引:44
作者
Veloso Madureira, Fernando Athayde [1 ]
Ferreira Manso, Jose Eduardo [2 ]
Madureira Fo, Delta [3 ]
Garrido Iglesias, Antonio Carlos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Estado Rio de Janeiro UNIRIO, Dept Gen Surg, BR-20270901 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Dept Gen Surg, BR-21941 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[3] Pontificia Univ Catolica PUC Rio, Dept Gen Surg, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2013年 / 27卷 / 03期
关键词
Cholecystectomy; Laparoscopic; Minimally invasive; LESS; Single port; SINGLE; SURGERY; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-012-2556-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) has emerged as a technique that uses a natural scar, the umbilicus, within which a multiple-entry portal is placed into a 3.0-4.0-cm single incision to perform operations. The objective of this study was to compare incision size, wound complications, and postoperative pain of LESS compared with those of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted between January and June 2011 at two university hospitals in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Fifty-seven patients were randomly assigned to undergo laparoscopic or LESS cholecystectomy. Skin and aponeurosis wound sizes were recorded. A 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess pain at postoperative hours 3 and 24. Healing and wound complications were assessed at follow-up. A total of 57 patients, 53 women and 4 men with a mean age of 48.7 years, were randomly assigned to undergo LESS (n = 28) or LC (n = 29). The mean length of the umbilical skin incision was 4.0 cm (range = 2.1-5.8) in LESS and 2.7 cm (1.5-5.1) in LC (p < .0001). The mean internal aponeurosis diameter was 3.5 cm (2.0-5.5) in LESS and 2.3 cm (1.2-3.5) in LC (p < .0001). The mean operative time was 60.3 min (32-128) for LESS and 51.3 min (25-120) for LC (p = 0.11). Gallbladder perforation at detachment occurred in 15.69 % of the LESS cases and in 5.88 % of the LC cases (p = 0.028). The mean VAS score for pain at hour 3 was 2.0 points (0-7) for the LESS group and 4.0 (0-10) for the LC group (p = 0.07), and at postoperative hour 24 it was 0.3 points (0-6) for LESS and 2.3 (0-10) for LC (p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in wound complications. Incisional hernias were not found in either group. The LESS single-port (SP) operations demand a bigger incision than LC surgery. However, there were no differences in healing, wound infections, and hernia development. We found a tendency of less postoperative pain associated with LESS/SP than with LC.
引用
收藏
页码:1009 / 1015
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   MEASUREMENT OF FEELINGS USING VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALES [J].
AITKEN, RCB .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE-LONDON, 1969, 62 (10) :989-+
[2]   Critical appraisal of single port access cholecystectomy [J].
Allemann, P. ;
Schafer, M. ;
Demartines, N. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 (10) :1476-1480
[3]   Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic partial nephrectomy [J].
Aron, Monish ;
Canes, David ;
Desai, Mihir M. ;
Haber, Georges-Pascal ;
Kaouk, Jihad H. ;
Gill, Inderbir S. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 103 (04) :516-521
[4]   Impact of single-port cholecystectomy on postoperative pain [J].
Asakuma, M. ;
Hayashi, M. ;
Komeda, K. ;
Shimizu, T. ;
Hirokawa, F. ;
Miyamoto, Y. ;
Okuda, J. ;
Tanigawa, N. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (07) :991-995
[5]   Elective transumbilical compared with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Bresadola, F ;
Pasqualucci, A ;
Donini, A ;
Chiarandini, P ;
Anania, G ;
Terrosu, G ;
Sistu, MA ;
Pasetto, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 165 (01) :29-34
[6]   From single-port access to laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy [J].
Bucher, Pascal ;
Pugin, Francois ;
Morel, Philippe .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (01) :234-235
[7]   Transumbilical Single-Port Surgery: Evolution and Current Status [J].
Canes, David ;
Desai, Mihir M. ;
Aron, Monish ;
Haber, Georges-Pascal ;
Goel, Raj K. ;
Stein, Robert J. ;
Kaouk, Jihad H. ;
Gill, Inderbir S. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (05) :1020-1030
[8]   Appendicectomy and Cholecystectomy Using Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS): The First UK Experience [J].
Chow, Andre ;
Purkayastha, Sanjay ;
Paraskeva, Paraskevas .
SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2009, 16 (03) :211-217
[9]  
Chuang SC, 2004, J FORMOS MED ASSOC, V103, P607
[10]   The "invisible cholecystectomy'': A transumbilical laparoscopic operation without a scar [J].
Cuesta, Miguel A. ;
Berends, Frits ;
Veenhof, Alexander A. F. A. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (05) :1211-1213