QTWiST analysis of the RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer

被引:20
|
作者
Tabernero, Josep [1 ]
Van Cutsem, Eric [2 ]
Ohtsu, Atsushi [3 ]
Amellal, Nadia [4 ]
Cadour, Stephanie [4 ]
Fougeray, Ronan [4 ]
Haffemayer, Benjamin [5 ]
Mayer, Robert J. [6 ]
机构
[1] Vall dHebron Univ Hosp, Vall dHebron Inst Oncol, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Hosp Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Natl Canc Ctr Hosp East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
[4] Inst Rech Int Servier, Suresnes, France
[5] Servier, Market Access Dept, Suresnes, France
[6] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PERFORMANCE STATUS; ASSOCIATION; TAS-102;
D O I
10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000284
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose A Quality-adjusted Time WIthout Symptoms of disease or Toxicity (QTWiST) analysis was carried out to assess quality-adjusted survival time in the RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods Duration of overall survival in the RECOURSE trial (n=798 patients) was partitioned into three discrete health states: toxicity (TOX), time without symptoms or toxicity (TWIST) and relapse (REL). TOX was defined as time spent with grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) after randomisation and before progression or censoring. AEs were limited to those related to trifluridine/tipiracil and known to affect quality of life (QoL) (ie, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, fatigue/asthaenia, anorexia and febrile neutropaenia). The estimated mean duration of each state, weighted by a utility coefficient representing QoL, was combined into a global QTWiST score. Results In the RECOURSE trial, overall survival was 7.1 months with trifluridine/tipiracil versus 5.3 months with placebo. Patients receiving trifluridine/tipiracil spent longer in each health state than placebo recipients. Using assumed utility coefficients of 1 for TWIST and 0.5 for TOX and REL, the QTWiST was 5.48 months for the trifluridine/tipiracil group and 3.98 months for the placebo group, a difference of 1.5 (95% CI 1.49 to 1.52) months in favour of trifluridine/tipiracil. A sensitivity analysis using large variations in utility coefficients for TOX and REL produced a range of only approximately 0.5 months from minimum to maximum QTWiST. Conclusions Quality-adjusted survival, as measured by QTWiST, shows clinically meaningful improvements in patients treated with trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in pretreated mCRC.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients treated in RECOURSE by prognostic factors at baseline: an exploratory analysis
    Tabernero, Josep
    Argiles, Guillem
    Sobrero, Alberto F.
    Borg, Christophe
    Ohtsu, Atsushi
    Mayer, Robert J.
    Vidot, Loick
    Vera, Shanti R. Moreno
    Van Cutsem, Eric
    ESMO OPEN, 2020, 5 (04)
  • [32] Trifluridine/tipiracil with or without bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yoshino, Takayuki
    Taieb, Julien
    Kuboki, Yasutoshi
    Pfeiffer, Per
    Kumar, Amit
    Hochster, Howard S. S.
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 15
  • [33] Trifluridine/tipiracil as a therapeutic option in real life setting of metastatic colorectal cancer: An efficacy and safety analysis
    Sur, Daniel
    Lungulescu, Cristina
    Spinu, Stefan
    Gorzo, Alecsandra
    Dumitrescu, Elena-Adriana
    Gheonea, Dan Ionut
    Lungulescu, Cristian-Virgil
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [34] Efficacy of trifluridine and tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo, with supportive care, in a randomized, controlled trial of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from Spain: results of a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 RECOURSE trial
    Longo-Munoz, F.
    Argiles, G.
    Tabernero, J.
    Cervantes, A.
    Gravalos, C.
    Pericay, C.
    Gil-Calle, S.
    Mizuguchi, H.
    Carrato-Mena, A.
    Limon, M. L.
    Garcia-Carbonero, R.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 19 (02) : 227 - 235
  • [35] Real-world use of trifluridine/tipiracil for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Canada
    Samawi, H. H.
    Brezden-Masley, C.
    Afzal, A. R.
    Cheung, W. Y.
    Dolley, A.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 (05) : 319 - +
  • [36] Duration of previous treatment as a prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/tipiracil
    Skuja, Elina
    Gerina-Berzina, Aija
    Hegmane, Alinta
    Zvirbule, Zanete
    Vecvagare, Eva
    Purkalne, Gunta
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 8 (05) : 699 - 702
  • [37] Comparative Cost-utility Analysis of Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil in The Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Japan
    Kashiwa, Munenobu
    Matsushita, Ryo
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 42 (07) : 1376 - 1387
  • [38] Efficacy of trifluridine and tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo, with supportive care, in a randomized, controlled trial of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from Spain: results of a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 RECOURSE trial
    F. Longo-Muñoz
    G. Argiles
    J. Tabernero
    A. Cervantes
    C. Gravalos
    C. Pericay
    S. Gil-Calle
    H. Mizuguchi
    A. Carrato-Mena
    M. L. Limón
    R. Garcia-Carbonero
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2017, 19 : 227 - 235
  • [39] Regorafenib or Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer? A Perspective on the Basis of Pharmacological Costs
    Giuliani, Jacopo
    Bonetti, Andrea
    CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2018, 17 (02) : E381 - E383
  • [40] Post-marketing surveillance study of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
    Yoshino, Takayuki
    Uetake, Hiroyuki
    Funato, Yuya
    Yamaguchi, Yasunobu
    Koyama, Takahiko
    Ozawa, Daisuke
    Tajiri, Masaru
    Muro, Kei
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 51 (05) : 700 - 706