QTWiST analysis of the RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer

被引:20
|
作者
Tabernero, Josep [1 ]
Van Cutsem, Eric [2 ]
Ohtsu, Atsushi [3 ]
Amellal, Nadia [4 ]
Cadour, Stephanie [4 ]
Fougeray, Ronan [4 ]
Haffemayer, Benjamin [5 ]
Mayer, Robert J. [6 ]
机构
[1] Vall dHebron Univ Hosp, Vall dHebron Inst Oncol, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Hosp Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Natl Canc Ctr Hosp East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
[4] Inst Rech Int Servier, Suresnes, France
[5] Servier, Market Access Dept, Suresnes, France
[6] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PERFORMANCE STATUS; ASSOCIATION; TAS-102;
D O I
10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000284
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose A Quality-adjusted Time WIthout Symptoms of disease or Toxicity (QTWiST) analysis was carried out to assess quality-adjusted survival time in the RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods Duration of overall survival in the RECOURSE trial (n=798 patients) was partitioned into three discrete health states: toxicity (TOX), time without symptoms or toxicity (TWIST) and relapse (REL). TOX was defined as time spent with grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) after randomisation and before progression or censoring. AEs were limited to those related to trifluridine/tipiracil and known to affect quality of life (QoL) (ie, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, fatigue/asthaenia, anorexia and febrile neutropaenia). The estimated mean duration of each state, weighted by a utility coefficient representing QoL, was combined into a global QTWiST score. Results In the RECOURSE trial, overall survival was 7.1 months with trifluridine/tipiracil versus 5.3 months with placebo. Patients receiving trifluridine/tipiracil spent longer in each health state than placebo recipients. Using assumed utility coefficients of 1 for TWIST and 0.5 for TOX and REL, the QTWiST was 5.48 months for the trifluridine/tipiracil group and 3.98 months for the placebo group, a difference of 1.5 (95% CI 1.49 to 1.52) months in favour of trifluridine/tipiracil. A sensitivity analysis using large variations in utility coefficients for TOX and REL produced a range of only approximately 0.5 months from minimum to maximum QTWiST. Conclusions Quality-adjusted survival, as measured by QTWiST, shows clinically meaningful improvements in patients treated with trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in pretreated mCRC.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The safety and efficacy of trifluridine-tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer: A pharmacy perspective
    Chan, Betty M.
    Hochster, Howard S.
    Lenz, Heinz-Josef
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2019, 76 (06) : 339 - 348
  • [22] Economic evaluation of trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Greece
    Gourzoulidis, George
    Maniadakis, Nikos
    Petrakis, Dimitrios
    Souglakos, John
    Pentheroudakis, George
    Kourlaba, Georgia
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (03) : 133 - 142
  • [23] Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib: New Weapons in the War Against Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Weinberg, Benjamin A.
    Marshall, John L.
    Salem, Mohamed E.
    CLINICAL ADVANCES IN HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY, 2016, 14 (08) : 630 - 638
  • [24] Trifluridine/tipiracil for the treatment of metastatic gastric cancer
    Kawazoe, Akihito
    Shitara, Kohei
    EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 14 (02) : 65 - 70
  • [25] Trifluridine/Tipiracil: A Review in Metastatic Gastric Cancer
    Kang, Connie
    Dhillon, Sohita
    Deeks, Emma D.
    DRUGS, 2019, 79 (14) : 1583 - 1590
  • [26] A Retrospective Study of Trifluridine/Tipiracil with Fruquintinib in Patients with Chemorefractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Zou, Jiayun
    Wang, Yuanyuan
    Xu, Jiayu
    Li, Jinna
    Wang, Tianzhuo
    Zhang, Ying
    Bai, Yibo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [27] Retrospective cohort study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
    Daisuke Kotani
    Yasutoshi Kuboki
    Satoshi Horasawa
    Asumi Kaneko
    Yoshiaki Nakamura
    Akihito Kawazoe
    Hideaki Bando
    Hiroya Taniguchi
    Kohei Shitara
    Takashi Kojima
    Akihito Tsuji
    Takayuki Yoshino
    BMC Cancer, 19
  • [28] Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study
    Li, Rong-Rong
    Zhou, Hui-Jun
    Zeng, De-Yu
    Jiang, Shao-Feng
    Liu, Wu
    Fruehling, Petter
    Liu, Zhen-Yang
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 15 (02) : 612 - 629
  • [29] Subgroup analyses from patients with pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil: results of the TALLISUR trial
    Karthaus, Meinolf
    Heinemann, Volker
    Riera-Knorrenschild, Jorge
    Kretzschmar, Albrecht
    Welslau, Manfred
    Kaiser, Ulrich
    Pelz, Henning
    Ettrich, Thomas J.
    Held, Swantje
    Kehmann, Linde
    Hess, Juergen
    Reislaender, Timo
    Weiss, Lena
    BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [30] Predicting Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment Outcomes in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Exploratory Analysis
    Prejac, Juraj
    Omcen, Tomislav
    Radic, Jasna
    Vrdoljak, Eduard
    Frobe, Ana
    Plestina, Stjepko
    ONCOLOGY, 2024, 102 (03) : 217 - 227