Do pregnant women and their partners make an informed choice about first trimester risk assessment for Down syndrome, and are they satisfied with the choice?

被引:30
作者
Bangsgaard, Louise [1 ]
Tabor, Ann [1 ]
机构
[1] Rigshosp, Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet, Ctr Fetal Med, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
MULTIDIMENSIONAL MEASURE; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1002/pd.4026
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objective All pregnant women in Denmark are offered risk assessment for Down syndrome. The aim of this study was to investigate whether women and partners make an informed choice about first trimester risk assessment, and their satisfaction with the choice. Methods A survey using multiple measure of informed choice at 12weeks and decision regret scale at 30weeks, among pregnant women and partners, planning to deliver at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet. Results Five hundred thirty-one women (99.6%) out of 534 women chose to have risk assessment. Most women and men had high degree of knowledge (82% and 81%) and positive attitudes regarding risk assessment (97% and 98%), leading to 79% and 80% making an informed choice. Education predicted knowledge for women (odds ratio 3.42; 95% confidence interval 1.637.18) and partners (odds ratio 2.97; 95% confidence interval 1.376.45), country of origin predicted knowledge, attitude and informed choice among women. Three hundred thirty-two women (99%) and all partners were satisfied with having chosen risk assessment. Conclusions Although 80% of pregnant women and partners make an informed choice about undergoing first trimester risk assessment for Down syndrome, as many as 20% do not. At 30weeks nearly all women and partners were satisfied to have had a risk assessment performed. (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 152
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Attitude of women with IVF and spontaneous pregnancies towards prenatal screening
    Abu-Musa, Antoine A.
    Nassar, Anwar H.
    Usta, Ihab M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2008, 23 (11) : 2438 - 2443
  • [2] THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR
    AJZEN, I
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) : 179 - 211
  • [3] [Anonymous], GUID FET DIAGN PREN
  • [4] Bekker H, 1999, Health Technol Assess, V3, P1
  • [5] Applying decision analysis to facilitate informed decision making about prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome: a randomised controlled trial
    Bekker, HL
    Hewison, J
    Thornton, JG
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2004, 24 (04) : 265 - 275
  • [6] Validation of a decision regret scale
    Brehaut, JC
    O'Connor, AM
    Wood, TJ
    Hack, TF
    Siminoff, L
    Gordon, E
    Feldman-Stewart, D
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2003, 23 (04) : 281 - 292
  • [7] Connor AM, 1996, USERS MANUAL DECISIO
  • [8] First-trimester Down syndrome screening: pregnant women's knowledge
    Dahl, K.
    Hvidman, L.
    Jorgensen, F. S.
    Henriques, C.
    Olesen, F.
    Kjaergaard, H.
    Kesmodel, U. S.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 38 (02) : 145 - 151
  • [9] *DAN NAT BOARD HLT, 2003, REP WORK COMM PREN D
  • [10] Low uptake of prenatal screening for Down syndrome in minority ethnic groups and socially deprived groups: a reflection of women's attitudes or a failure to facilitate informed choices?
    Dormandy, E
    Michie, S
    Hooper, R
    Marteau, TM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 34 (02) : 346 - 352