How do policies mobilize private finance for renewable energy?-A systematic review with an investor perspective

被引:231
作者
Polzin, Friedemann [1 ]
Egli, Florian [2 ]
Steffen, Bjarne [2 ]
Schmidt, Tobias S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Utrecht Univ Sch Econ USE, SFL, Kriekenpitpl 21-22, NL-3584 EC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Humanities Social & Polit Sci, Energy Polit Grp, Haldeneggsteig 4, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Renewable energy; Investment; Policy design; Risk-return; Feed-in tariff; Renewable portfolio standards; Auctions; FEED-IN TARIFF; WIND POWER DEVELOPMENT; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; PUBLIC-POLICY; REGULATORY UNCERTAINTY; ECONOMIC INSTRUMENTS; PORTFOLIO STANDARD; CLIMATE POLICY; INVESTMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.098
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
With the urgency of climate change, and billions spent globally on renewable energy (RE) support policies, it is crucial to understand which policies are effective. Substantial scholarly research on RE deployment policies has been carried out over the last two decades, resulting in inconclusive findings regarding the effectiveness of mobilizing private finance. Here, we take a novel perspective and review 96 empirical studies concerning the impact of policies on two key investor decision metrics: investment risk and investment return. Only if both metrics correspond to the investors' expectations are they willing to engage in RE projects. First, our rigorous literature review shows that effective policies address risk and return simultaneously. Second, we find that generic instrument design features, such as credibility and predictability (continuous evaluation and monitoring), considerably impact investment risk. A more focused analysis of the specific design elements of feed-in tariffs, auctions and renewable portfolio standards reveals that these instruments are most effective when they are designed in such a way that they reduce RE project risk while increasing return. We distil important implications for policymakers who aim to foster renewable energy and clean technologies more broadly.
引用
收藏
页码:1249 / 1268
页数:20
相关论文
共 171 条
[1]   Review of policies encouraging renewable energy integration & best practices [J].
Abdmouleh, Zeineb ;
Alammari, Rashid A. M. ;
Gastli, Adel .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 45 :249-262
[2]   The main support mechanisms to finance renewable energy development [J].
Abolhosseini, Shahrouz ;
Heshmati, Almas .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 40 :876-885
[3]   Determinants of renewable energy growth: A global sample analysis [J].
Aguirre, Mariana ;
Ibikunle, Gbenga .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 69 :374-384
[4]   What drives renewable energy development? [J].
Alagappan, L. ;
Orans, R. ;
Woo, C. K. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (09) :5099-5104
[5]  
Ang G., 2017, OECD Environment Working Papers, V123, DOI [10.1787/67d221b8-en, DOI 10.1787/67D221B8-EN]
[6]   Risk-based analysis and policy implications for renewable energy investments in Greece [J].
Angelopoulos, Dimitrios ;
Doukas, Harts ;
Psarras, John ;
Stamtsis, Giorgos .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 105 :512-523
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Global Status Report 2017
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Applied Energy, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2010.03.001
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Principles of project finance
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2015, MITIGATION POLITICAL