Evaluation of an in-house real-time polymerase chain reaction method to identify group B streptococcus colonization in pregnancy

被引:8
作者
Yeung, Sik-Wing [1 ]
Cheung, Pik-Tsz [2 ]
Chau, Sze-Lok [2 ]
Ip, Margaret [2 ]
Lao, Terence Tzu-Hsi [1 ]
Leung, Tak-Yeung [1 ]
Tam, Wing-Hung [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Microbiol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
bacteria colonization; group B streptococcus; neonatal infection; pregnancy and real-time polymerase chain reaction; PREVENTION; CULTURE; AGALACTIAE; CARRIAGE; WOMEN; PCR;
D O I
10.1111/jog.12724
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of in-house real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in detecting group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization compared with the standard culture method in a cohort of pregnant women. Material and Methods: total of 134 rectovaginal swabs were collected from 125 pregnant women, of whom 108 were known carriers or presented with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. The swabs were placed in Standard Methods Broth (Todd-Hewitt broth supplemented with 6 mu g/mL gentamicin and 15 mu g/mL nalidixic acid) for culture identification of GBS. An in-house qPCR was also performed from the broth and after overnight incubation of the broth. Results: The detection rate of GBS in this cohort was 30.6% and 50.7% using standard culture method and qPCR, respectively. GBS-specific qPCR assay gave sensitivities of 97.6% and 100%, specificities of 73.1% and 71.0%, and negative predictive values of 98.6% and 100% from direct specimen and from broth after overnight incubation, respectively. Conclusions: The in-house qPCR test has high sensitivity in detecting GBS colonization. The high negative predictive value helps to avoid unnecessary use of antibiotics in uncolonized women.
引用
收藏
页码:1357 / 1362
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], CLIN CHEM
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, EP17A2 CLSI
  • [3] [Anonymous], Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD000115
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2003, RCOG
  • [5] Group B streptococcal infections
    Baker, CJ
    [J]. CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 1997, 24 (01) : 59 - +
  • [6] Real-time PCR targeting the sip gene for detection of group B streptococcus colonization in pregnant women at delivery
    Bergseng, Hakon
    Bevanger, Lars
    Rygg, Marite
    Bergh, Kare
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 56 (02) : 223 - 228
  • [7] Neonatal group B streptococcal disease
    Cronin, M
    Walker, AM
    Leeson, S
    Dunkin, K
    Markland, M
    [J]. LANCET, 2001, 357 (9261) : 1045 - 1045
  • [8] Comparison of different sampling techniques and of different culture methods for detection of group B streptococcus carriage in pregnant women
    El Aila, Nabil A.
    Tency, Inge
    Claeys, Geert
    Saerens, Bart
    Cools, Piet
    Verstraelen, Hans
    Temmerman, Marleen
    Verhelst, Rita
    Vaneechoutte, Mario
    [J]. BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2010, 10
  • [9] Comparison of culture with two different qPCR assays for detection of rectovaginal carriage of Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococci) in pregnant women
    El Aila, Nabil Abdullah
    Tency, Inge
    Claeys, Geert
    Verstraelen, Hans
    Deschaght, Pieter
    Decat, Ellen
    Santiago, Guido Lopes dos Santos
    Cools, Piet
    Temmerman, Marleen
    Vaneechoutte, Mario
    [J]. RESEARCH IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 162 (05) : 499 - 505
  • [10] Performance of RT-PCR in the detection of Streptococcus agalactiae in the anogenital tract of pregnant women
    Feuerschuette, Otto May
    Serratine, Ana Claudina
    Bazzo, Maria Luiza
    Martins, Toni Ricardo
    Silveira, Sheila Koetker
    da Silva, Rosemeri Maurici
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 286 (06) : 1437 - 1442