The relationship between anogenital distance and age

被引:31
作者
Eisenberg, M. L. [1 ]
Hsieh, T. -C. [2 ]
Lipshultz, L. I. [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Scott Dept Urol, Div Male Reprod Med & Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
azoospermia; genitalia; humans; perineum; PROGRAMMING WINDOW; REPRODUCTIVE-TRACT; ANDROGEN ACTION; MASCULINIZATION; DISRUPTION;
D O I
10.1111/j.2047-2927.2012.00019.x
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
In humans, recent studies have correlated anogenital distance (AGD) in adult men to intrinsic testicular function. Although rodent studies suggest that AGD is determined in utero and remains constant in adult life, it is not certain if AGD remains constant across a man's adult life. We sought to determine if adult male AGD varies based on age. A cross-sectional study of men being evaluated at a men's health clinic. Anogenital distance (the distance from the posterior aspect of the scrotum to the anal verge) and penile length (PL) were measured using digital callipers. ANOVA and linear regression were used to determine correlations between AGD, fatherhood status and age. In all, 473 men were included in the analysis with a mean age of 43 +/- 13 years. The mean AGD for the group was 39 +/- 13 mm. Anogenital distance did not vary between age categories for the entire group, for fathers, and for childless men. Moreover, penile length also remained constant across age categories. On adjusted analyses stratified by fatherhood status, there was no relationship between AGDp and age. The current cross-sectional study demonstrates that anogenital distance, defined as the distance from the posterior scrotum to the anal verge, is similar for men of different ages. As such, AGD may provide a measure for genital development and function throughout adult life. However, confirmation with longitudinal studies is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 93
页数:4
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [21] Relationship between androgen action in the "Male Programming Window," fetal sertoli cell number, and adult testis size in the rat
    Scott, Hayley M.
    Hutchison, Gary R.
    Jobling, Matthew S.
    McKinnell, Chris
    Drake, Amanda J.
    Sharpe, Richard M.
    [J]. ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2008, 149 (10) : 5280 - 5287
  • [22] Role of androgens in fetal testis development and dysgenesis
    Scott, Hayley M.
    Hutchison, Gary R.
    Mahood, I. Kim
    Hallmark, Nina
    Welsh, Michelle
    De Gendt, Karel
    Verhoeven, Guido
    O'Shaughnessy, Peter
    Sharpe, Richard M.
    [J]. ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2007, 148 (05) : 2027 - 2036
  • [23] Decrease in anogenital distance among male infants with prenatal phthalate exposure
    Swan, SH
    Main, KM
    Liu, F
    Stewart, SL
    Kruse, RL
    Calafat, AM
    Mao, CS
    Redmon, JB
    Ternand, CL
    Sullivan, S
    Teague, JL
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2005, 113 (08) : 1056 - 1061
  • [24] Anogenital Distance from Birth to 2 Years: a Population Study
    Thankamony, Ajay
    Ong, Ken K.
    Dunger, David B.
    Acerini, Carlo L.
    Hughes, Ieuan A.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2009, 117 (11) : 1786 - 1790
  • [25] Relative importance of prenatal and postnatal androgen action in determining growth of the penis and anogenital distance in the rat before, during and after puberty
    van den Driesche, S.
    Scott, H. M.
    MacLeod, D. J.
    Fisken, M.
    Walker, M.
    Sharpe, R. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2011, 34 (06): : E578 - E586
  • [26] Identification in rats of a programming window for reproductive tract masculinization, disruption of which leads to hypospadias and cryptorchidism
    Welsh, Michelle
    Saunders, Philippa T. K.
    Fisken, Mark
    Scott, Hayley M.
    Hutchison, Gary R.
    Smith, Lee B.
    Sharpe, Richard M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2008, 118 (04) : 1479 - 1490
  • [27] Critical androgen-sensitive periods of rat penis and clitoris development
    Welsh, Michelle
    MacLeod, David J.
    Walker, Marion
    Smith, Lee B.
    Sharpe, Richard M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2010, 33 (01): : E144 - E152