Review and evaluation of hydrogen production options for better environment

被引:690
作者
Acar, Canan [1 ]
Dincer, Ibrahim [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Bahcesehir Univ, Fac Engn & Nat Sci, Ciragan Caddesi 4-6, TR-34353 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Univ Ontario Inst Technol, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, 2000 Simcoe St North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
[3] Yildiz Tech Univ, Fac Mech Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Hydrogen production; Hydrogen economy; Sustainability; Energy; Sources; ENERGY DEMAND; SOLAR HYDROGEN; TECHNOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; TRANSPORTATION FUEL; ROAD TRANSPORTATION; RENEWABLE HYDROGEN; STORAGE MATERIALS; NATURAL-GAS; SYSTEM; CARBON;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.046
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this study, different hydrogen production sources and systems and some hydrogen storage options are comparatively investigated in detail. Economic, environmental, social, and technical performance and reliability of the selected options are compared in detail. Biomass, geothermal, hydro, nuclear, solar, and wind are the selected hydrogen production sources; biological, thermal, photonic, and electrical are the selected hydrogen production methods; and chemical hydrides, compressed gas, cryogenic liquid, metal hydrides, and nanomaterials are the selected hydrogen storage systems. In addition, some case studies and basic research needs to enhance the performance of hydrogen energy systems and to tackle the major challenges of the hydrogen economy are provided. The results show that solar has the highest environmental performance (8/10) and the total average ranking (7.40/10), nuclear has the lowest environmental performance (3/10), and geothermal has the lowest total average ranking (4/10/10) among selected hydrogen production sources. Hydrogen production systems' comparison indicates that photonic options have the highest environmental performance ranking (8/10), thermal options have the lowest environmental performance ranking (5/10), electrical options have the highest average ranking (7.60/10), and biological options have the lowest average ranking (4.80/10). (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:835 / 849
页数:15
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
Acar C., 2014, Progress in Exergy, Energy,and the Environment, P145
[2]   Sustainability analysis of different hydrogen production options using hesitant fuzzy AHP [J].
Acar, Canan ;
Beskese, Ahmet ;
Temur, Gul Tekin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (39) :18059-18076
[3]   Hydrogen fuel and transport system: A sustainable and environmental future [J].
Ahmed, Adeel ;
Al-Amin, Abul Quasern ;
Ambrose, Angelina F. ;
Saidur, R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2016, 41 (03) :1369-1380
[4]   Zero-energy hydrogen economy (ZEH2E) for buildings and communities including personal mobility [J].
Alanne, Kari ;
Cao, Sunliang .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 71 :697-711
[5]   Energy storage technologies and real life applications - A state of the art review [J].
Aneke, Mathew ;
Wang, Meihong .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 179 :350-377
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, HYDROGEN SCI ENG MAT
[7]   Thermal energy storage coupled with PV panels for demand side management of industrial building cooling loads [J].
Arteconi, Alessia ;
Ciarrocchi, Eleonora ;
Pan, Quanwen ;
Carducci, Francesco ;
Comodi, Gabriele ;
Polonara, Fabio ;
Wang, Ruzhu .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 185 :1984-1993
[8]   Advanced oxidation processes for in-situ production of hydrogen peroxide/hydroxyl radical for textile wastewater treatment: a review [J].
Asghar, Anam ;
Raman, Abdul Aziz Abdul ;
Daud, Wan Mohd Ashri Wan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 87 :826-838
[9]   Sankey-Diagram-based insights into the hydrogen economy of today [J].
Bakenne, Adetokunboh ;
Nuttall, William ;
Kazantzis, Nikolaos .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2016, 41 (19) :7744-7753
[10]   The hydrogen economy - Vision or reality? [J].
Ball, Michael ;
Weeda, Marcel .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2015, 40 (25) :7903-7919