Characteristics of tracheostomy phonation valves

被引:16
作者
Prigent, H
Orlikowski, D
Blumen, MB
Leroux, K
Legrand, L
Lejaille, M
Falaize, L
Ruquet, M
Raphael, JC
Lofaso, F
机构
[1] Hop Raymond Poincare, AP HP, Serv Reanimat Med, Garches, France
[2] Hop Raymond Poincare, Ctr Innovat Technol, Garches, France
[3] Foch Teaching Hosp, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Suresnes, France
[4] ADEP, Puteaux La Defense, France
[5] INSERM, U 651, Creteil, France
关键词
phonation valve; resistance; respiratory load; speaking valve; tracheostomy;
D O I
10.1183/09031936.06.00009405
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Phonation valves are commonly used devices that allow the restoration of speech in tracheostomised patients. However, their use should not compromise the physiological benefit of tracheostomy. Six commercialised phonation valves were studied in a dynamic set-up simulating a respiratory frequency of 20 breaths-min(-1), a tidal volume of 0.5 L and a peak flow rate of 0.5 L(.)s(-1). Resistance and additional work of breathing (WOB) were calculated. In 10 tracheostomised patients, evaluations using no phonation valve (baseline), and the most and one of the least resistive valves were carried out. Respiratory patterns and gas exchanges were recorded. Inspiratory difficulty was evaluated using the modified Borg scale. Valves displayed a wide array of resistance ranging 1.3-5.9 cmH(2)O(.)L(-1.)s(-1). Additional WOB varied with a ratio of 4.4 between the best and the worst valve. While the different clinical conditions did not modify respiratory patterns and gas exchanges, a significant effect on the Borg scale rating was observed using ANOVA and post hoc analysis of baseline versus worst valve and one of the best valves versus worst valve. In conclusion, the variety of aerodynamic characteristics of phonation valves should be considered when choosing the device, according to the underlying condition of the patients benefiting from their use.
引用
收藏
页码:992 / 996
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Electrophysiologic techniques for the assessment of respiratory muscle function [J].
Aldrich, TK ;
Sinderby, C ;
McKenzie, DK ;
Estenne, M ;
Gandevia, SC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 166 (04) :548-+
[2]   Prevention of pulmonary morbidity for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy [J].
Bach, JR ;
Ishikawa, Y ;
Kim, H .
CHEST, 1997, 112 (04) :1024-1028
[3]   TRACHEOSTOMY VENTILATION - A STUDY OF EFFICACY WITH DEFLATED CUFFS AND CUFFLESS TUBES [J].
BACH, JR ;
ALBA, AS .
CHEST, 1990, 97 (03) :679-683
[4]   EFFECT OF PRESSURE AND TIMING OF CONTRACTION ON HUMAN DIAPHRAGM FATIGUE [J].
BELLEMARE, F ;
GRASSINO, A .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1982, 53 (05) :1190-1195
[5]   PSYCHOPHYSICAL BASES OF PERCEIVED EXERTION [J].
BORG, GAV .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1982, 14 (05) :377-381
[6]   Physiological effects of decannulation in tracheostomized patients [J].
Chadda, K ;
Louis, B ;
Benaïssa, L ;
Annane, D ;
Gajdos, P ;
Raphaël, JC ;
Lofaso, F .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 28 (12) :1761-1767
[7]   LIFE EXPECTANCY OF VENTILATOR-DEPENDENT PERSONS WITH SPINAL-CORD INJURIOUS [J].
DEVIVO, MJ ;
IVIE, CS .
CHEST, 1995, 108 (01) :226-232
[8]   Changes in the work of breathing induced by tracheotomy in ventilator-dependent patients [J].
Diehl, JL ;
El Atrous, S ;
Touchard, D ;
Lemaire, F ;
Brochard, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 159 (02) :383-388
[9]   AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF TRACHEOSTOMY SPEAKING VALVES [J].
FORNATAROCLERICI, L ;
ZAJAC, DJ .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1993, 36 (03) :529-532
[10]   MEDICAL INDICATIONS FOR TRACHEOTOMY [J].
HEFFNER, JE .
CHEST, 1989, 96 (01) :186-190