Evidence in Ophthalmology: Are We Doing Better?

被引：6

作者：

Bojikian, Karine D. ^{[1
]}

Gupta, Divakar ^{[1
]}

Dettori, Jason M.

Dettori, Nathan J.

Dettori, Joseph R.

Chang, Peter

Slabaugh, Mark A. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Washington, Dept Ophthalmol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA

[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA

来源：

OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2015年 / 122卷 / 12期

关键词：

PUBLICATION; JOURNALS;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.06.012

中图分类号：

R77 [眼科学];

学科分类号：

100212 ;

摘要：

[No abstract available]

引用

页码：2584 / 2586

页数：4

共 5 条

[1]

[Anonymous], JAMA J AM MED ASS, DOI DOI 10.1001/JAMA.1992.03490170092032

[2] Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals [J].

Callaham, M ;

Wears, RL ;

Weber, E .

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (21) :2847-2850

[3] Electronic publication and the narrowing of science and scholarship [J].

Evans, James A. .

SCIENCE, 2008, 321 (5887) :395-399

[4] Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research [J].

Ioannidis, JPA .

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (02) :218-228

[5] How evidence-based are publications in clinical ophthalmic journals? [J].

Lai, Timothy Y. Y. ;

Leung, Gabriel M. ;

Wong, Victoria W. Y. ;

Lam, Robert F. ;

Cheng, Andy C. O. ;

Lam, Dennis S. C. .

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2006, 47 (05) :1831-1838

← 1 →