Evaluation of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging at Inclusion in an Active Surveillance Protocol for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer

被引:61
|
作者
Somford, Diederik M. [1 ,2 ]
Hoeks, Caroline M. [3 ]
Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A. [4 ]
Hambrock, Thomas [3 ]
Futterer, Jurgen J. [3 ]
Witjes, J. Alfred [2 ]
Bangma, Chris H. [5 ]
Vergunst, Henk [1 ]
Smits, Geert A. [6 ]
Oddens, Jorg R. [7 ]
van Oort, Inge M. [2 ]
Barentsz, Jelle O. [3 ]
机构
[1] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Urol, NL-6532 SZ Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus MC, Dept Urol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Rijnstate Hosp, Dept Urol, Arnhem, Netherlands
[7] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Dept Urol, sHertogenbosch, Netherlands
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; magnetic resonance imaging; diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; active surveillance; apparent diffusion coefficient; RADICAL-PROSTATECTOMY; GLEASON SCORE; GUIDED BIOPSIES; PATHOLOGICAL FEATURES; HISTOLOGIC GRADE; REPEAT BIOPSY; AGGRESSIVENESS; COEFFICIENT; TUMOR; MEN;
D O I
10.1097/RLI.0b013e31827b711e
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: We aimed to determine whether diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, by means of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), is able to guide magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in patients fit for active surveillance (AS) and identify patients harboring high-grade Gleason components not suitable for AS. Materials and Methods: Our study was approved by the institutional review board of all participating hospitals, and all patients signed informed consent at inclusion. Fifty-four consecutive patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) at inclusion for AS. Cancer-suspicious regions (CSRs) upon 3-T MP-MRI were identified in all patients, and magnetic resonance-guided biopsy was performed in all CSRs to obtain histopathological verification. For all CSRs, a median ADC (mADC) was calculated. Wilcoxon signed ranks and Mann-Whitney tests was performed to detect differences between the groups. We used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to evaluate the accuracy of mADC to predict the presence of PCa in a CSR. Level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Mean mADC in the CSRs with PCa was 1.04 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s (SD, 0.29), whereas the CSRs with no PCa displayed a mean mADC of 1.26 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s (SD, 0.25; P < 0.001). Cancer-suspicious regions with a high-grade Gleason component displayed a mean mADC of 0.84 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s (SD, 0.35) vs a mean mADC for the low-grade CSRs of 1.09 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s (SD, 0.25; P < 0.05). A diagnostic accuracy of mADC for predicting the presence of PCa in a CSR with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.73 was established (95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.84). Conclusions: Median ADC is able to predict the presence and grade of PCa in CSRs identified by MP-MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 157
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cognitive and Affective Representations of Active Surveillance as a Treatment Option for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Lyons, Kathleen D.
    Li, Hsin H.
    Mader, Emily M.
    Stewart, Telisa M.
    Morley, Christopher P.
    Formica, Margaret K.
    Perrapato, Scott D.
    Seigne, John D.
    Hyams, Elias S.
    Irwin, Brian H.
    Mosher, Terry
    Hegel, Mark T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2017, 11 (01) : 63 - 72
  • [42] Is it appropriate to conduct conventional active surveillance for Asian men with low-risk prostate cancer?
    Ming Xu
    Li Zhang
    Chaozhao Liang
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2016, 48 : 1287 - 1289
  • [43] The role of 3-tesla diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in selecting prostate cancer patients for active surveillance
    Jeong, Chang Wook
    Park, Yong Hyun
    Hwang, Sung Il
    Lee, Sangchul
    Jeong, Seong Jin
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Lee, Hak Jong
    Lee, Sang Eun
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2 (04) : 169 - 175
  • [44] Active surveillance of low risk prostate cancer
    Lellig, K.
    Beyer, B.
    Graefen, M.
    Zaak, D.
    Stief, C.
    UROLOGE, 2014, 53 (07): : 1031 - 1039
  • [45] Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: The Accuracy of Multiparametric MR Imaging for Detection
    Kim, Jin Young
    Kim, See Hyung
    Kim, Young Hwan
    Lee, Hee Jung
    Kim, Mi Jeong
    Choi, Mi Sun
    RADIOLOGY, 2014, 271 (02) : 435 - 444
  • [46] Characterization of prostate cancer with MR spectroscopic imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 Tesla
    Mazaheri, Yousef
    Shukla-Dave, Amita
    Goldman, Debra A.
    Moskowitz, Chaya S.
    Takeda, Toshikazu
    Reuter, Victor E.
    Akin, Oguz
    Hricak, Hedvig
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 55 : 93 - 102
  • [47] Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the evaluation of pulmonary lesions
    Liu, Haidong
    Liu, Ying
    Yu, Tielian
    Ye, Ning
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (04) : 807 - 815
  • [48] Low serum total testosterone level as a predictor of upstaging and upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer patients meeting the inclusion criteria for active surveillance
    Ferro, Matteo
    Lucarelli, Giuseppe
    Bruzzese, Dario
    Di Lorenzo, Giuseppe
    Perdona, Sisto
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Cantiello, Francesco
    La Rocca, Roberto
    Busetto, Gian Maria
    Cimmino, Amelia
    Buonerba, Carlo
    Battaglia, Michele
    Damiano, Rocco
    De Cobelli, Ottavio
    Mirone, Vincenzo
    Terracciano, Daniela
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (11) : 18424 - 18434
  • [49] THE ERA OF ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR LOW-RISK PROSTATE CANCER IS HERE
    Sountoulides, Petros
    Obek, Can
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2016, 69 (02): : 49 - 51
  • [50] Evaluation of D'Amico criteria for low-risk prostate cancer
    Milonas, Daimantas
    Kincius, Marius
    Skulcius, Giedrius
    Matjosaitis, Aivaras Jonas
    Gudinaviciene, Inga
    Jievaltas, Mindaugas
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 48 (04) : 344 - 349