The case against a positivist philosophy of requirements engineering

被引:7
作者
Hinds, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Comp Lab, Ctr Requirements & Fdn, Oxford OX1 3QD, England
关键词
philosophy; positivism; scientism; realism; ethnography; ethics;
D O I
10.1007/s00766-008-0061-9
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Requirements engineering is a field with a heavy practical emphasis and for the most part is quite rightly unconcerned with philosophical reflection. However, there have been exceptions. Philosophical arguments are important because they can be used to powerful effect, facilitating explicit debate on views that may previously have been implicit, and shaping the direction of thought and research within the field. Several cases from both requirements engineering and software engineering have given prominence to the philosophy of positivism. This paper will outline arguments against such a view.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 328
页数:14
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
AKKERMANS H, 2006, 14 IEEE INT REQ ENG
[2]  
Alfred Schutz, 1967, PHENOMENOLOGY SOCIAL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1971, SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1988, SCI VERY IDEA
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1964, The structure of scientific revolutions
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, American Heritage dictionary of the English language, V4th
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1991, RISK RATIONALITY
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1979, DESIGN METHODS THEOR
[9]   Action research [J].
Avison, D ;
Lau, F ;
Myers, M ;
Nielsen, PA .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1999, 42 (01) :94-97
[10]  
AYER AJ, 2004, LANGUAGE TRUTH LOGIC