Penetrating oesophageal injury: A contemporary analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank

被引:23
作者
Patel, Madhukar S. [2 ]
Malinoski, Darren J. [3 ]
Zhou, Lynn [1 ]
Neal, Melanie L. [1 ]
Hoyt, David B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Coll Surg, Natl Trauma Data Bank, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA USA
[3] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2013年 / 44卷 / 01期
关键词
Penetrating oesophageal trauma; National Trauma Data Bank; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; CERVICAL ESOPHAGUS; PERFORATION; DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2011.11.015
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Oesophageal trauma is uncommon. The aim of this study was to conduct a descriptive analysis of penetrating oesophageal trauma and determine risk factors for oesophageal related complications and mortality in the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). Methods: Patients with penetrating oesophageal trauma from Levels 1 and 2 trauma centres in the NTDB (2007 and 2008) that specified how complication and comorbidity data were recorded were selected. Data collected included age, injury severity score (ISS), abbreviated injury scores (AIS), lengths of stay (LOS) and ventilation days, systolic blood pressure (SBP) in the emergency department (ED), comorbidities, oesophageal related procedures, and oesophageal related complications. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to identify significant predictors of oesophageal-related complications and mortality in patients with LOS > 24 h. Results: 227 patients from 107 centres were studied. The mean number of patients per centre was 2 (range 1-15). Overall mortality was found to be 44% with 92% of these deaths in less than 24 h. In patients with LOS > 24 h, 62% had primary repair, 13% drainage, 4% resection, 1% diversion, and 20% unspecified. No significant difference in mortality was found in patients with oesophageal related complications. The time to first oesophageal related procedure was not significantly different in those with oesophageal related complications or those who died. Significant predictors of oesophageal related complications were age and AIS of the abdomen or pelvic contents >= 3 and the only significant predictor of mortality was ISS. Conclusions: Most deaths in penetrating oesophageal trauma occur in the first 24 h due to severe associated injuries. Primary repair was the most common intervention, followed by drainage and resection. Oesophageal related complications were not found to significantly increase mortality and time to first oesophageal related procedure did not affect outcomes in this subset of patients from the NTDB. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 55
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF EXTERNAL PENETRATING CERVICAL ESOPHAGEAL INJURIES [J].
ARMSTRONG, WB ;
DETAR, TR ;
STANLEY, RB .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1994, 103 (11) :863-871
[2]   Penetrating esophageal injuries: Time interval of safety for preoperative evaluation - How long is safe? [J].
Asensio, JA ;
Berne, J ;
Demetriades, D ;
Murray, J ;
Gomez, H ;
Falabella, A ;
Fox, A ;
Velmahos, G ;
Shoemaker, W ;
Berne, TV .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1997, 43 (02) :319-324
[3]   Penetrating esophageal injuries: Multicenter study of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma [J].
Asensio, JA ;
Chahwan, S ;
Forno, W ;
MacKersie, R ;
Wall, M ;
Lake, J ;
Minard, G ;
Kirton, O ;
Nagy, K ;
Karmy-Jones, R ;
Brundage, S ;
Hoyt, D ;
Winchell, R ;
Kralovich, K ;
Shapiro, M ;
Falcone, R ;
McGuire, E ;
Ivatury, R ;
Stoner, M ;
Yelon, J ;
Ledgerwood, A ;
Luchette, F ;
Schwab, CW ;
Frankel, H ;
Chang, B ;
Coscia, R ;
Maull, K ;
Wang, D ;
Hirsch, E ;
Cue, J ;
Schmacht, D ;
Dunn, E ;
Miller, F ;
Powell, M ;
Sherck, J ;
Enderson, B ;
Rue, L ;
Warren, R ;
Rodriquez, J ;
West, M ;
Weireter, L ;
Britt, LD ;
Dries, D ;
Dunham, CM ;
Malangoni, M ;
Fallon, W ;
Simon, R ;
Bell, R ;
Hanpeter, D ;
Gambaro, E .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2001, 50 (02) :289-295
[4]   ESOPHAGEAL-PERFORATION - A THERAPEUTIC CHALLENGE [J].
ATTAR, S ;
HANKINS, JR ;
SUTER, CM ;
COUGHLIN, TR ;
SEQUEIRA, A ;
MCLAUGHLIN, JS .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1990, 50 (01) :45-51
[5]  
Bjerke H S, 1994, Chest Surg Clin N Am, V4, P811
[6]   DIAGNOSIS AND RECOMMENDED MANAGEMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL-PERFORATION AND RUPTURE [J].
BLADERGROEN, MR ;
LOWE, JE ;
POSTLETHWAIT, RW .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1986, 42 (03) :235-239
[7]  
Breasted J. H., 2006, E SMITH SURG PAPYRUS
[8]   HISTORY OF SURGERY OF THE ESOPHAGUS [J].
BREWER, LA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1980, 139 (06) :730-743
[9]   SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF PENETRATING INJURIES OF ESOPHAGUS [J].
DEFORE, WW ;
MATTOX, KL ;
HANSEN, HA ;
GARCIARINALDI, R ;
BEALL, AC ;
DEBAKEY, ME .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1977, 134 (06) :734-738
[10]   MANAGEMENT OF BLUNT AND PENETRATING EXTERNAL ESOPHAGEAL TRAUMA [J].
GLATTERER, MS ;
TOON, RS ;
ELLESTAD, C ;
MCFEE, AS ;
ROGERS, W ;
MACK, JW ;
TRINKLE, JK ;
GROVER, FL .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1985, 25 (08) :784-792