The effect of future land use changes on hydrologic ecosystem services: a case study from the Zala catchment, Hungary

被引:15
作者
Decsi, Bence [1 ]
Vari, Agnes [2 ]
Kozma, Zsolt [1 ]
机构
[1] Budapest Univ Technol & Econ, Dept Sanit & Environm Engn, Muegyet Rakpart 3,K Bldg,Mf 45-7, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Inst Ecol & Bot, MTA Ctr Ecol Res, Alkotmany U 2-4, H-2163 Vacratot, Hungary
关键词
Hydrologic ecosystem services; Land use change; Trade-off; Filtration; InVEST; NUTRIENT RETENTION; TOOLS; TRADEOFFS; LANDSCAPE; SEDIMENT; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1007/s42977-020-00032-6
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Maintaining and, where possible, improving the ecological status of our water resources are of particular importance for the future. So, one of the main drivers of landscape design must be to protect our waters. In this study, we carried out an evaluation of four hydrologic ecosystem services (HES) in the Zala River catchment area, the largest tributary of Lake Balaton (more than half of the lake's surface inflow comes from the Zala River), Hungary. The lake has great ecological, economic and social importance to the country. We used the cell-based InVEST model to quantify the spatial distribution of flood control, erosion control and nutrient retention ecosystem services for phosphorus and nitrogen; then, we carried out an aggregated evaluation. Thereby, we localized the hot spots of service delivery and tested the effect of focused land use changes in critical areas of low performance on the examined four HES. Forests proved to have the best aggregated result, while croplands near the stream network performed poorly. The modelled change in land use resulted in significant improvement on nutrient filtration and moderate to minimal but improving change for the other HES in most cases. The applied method is suitable as a supporting tool at the watershed level for decision-makers and landscape designers with the aim of protecting water bodies.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 418
页数:14
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
[2]  
ANIKO KH, 2019, TERMVED KOZL, V25, P80, DOI DOI 10.20332/tvk-jnatconserv.2019.25.80
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, EC HUM WELL BEING SY
[4]   A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation [J].
Bagstad, Kenneth J. ;
Semmens, Darius J. ;
Waage, Sissel ;
Winthrop, Robert .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2013, 5 :E27-E39
[5]   Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments [J].
Bateman, Ian J. ;
Mace, Georgina M. ;
Fezzi, Carlo ;
Atkinson, Giles ;
Turner, Kerry .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2011, 48 (02) :177-218
[6]   A review of the (Revised) Universal Soil Loss Equation ((R)USLE): with a view to increasing its global applicability and improving soil loss estimates [J].
Benavidez, Rubianca ;
Jackson, Bethanna ;
Maxwell, Deborah ;
Norton, Kevin .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2018, 22 (11) :6059-6086
[7]   Prolegomena to sediment and flow connectivity in the landscape: A GIS and field numerical assessment [J].
Borselli, Lorenzo ;
Cassi, Paola ;
Torri, Dino .
CATENA, 2008, 75 (03) :268-277
[8]  
Bozzay B, 2019, GUIDELINES 10000000
[9]  
Brauman KA, 2016, ROUTLEDGE HDB ECOSYS
[10]   Mapping and modelling ecosystem services for science, policy and practice [J].
Burkhard, Benjamin ;
Crossman, Neville ;
Nedkov, Stoyan ;
Petz, Katalin ;
Alkemade, Rob .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2013, 4 :1-3