Modeling heterotic effects in beef cattle using genome-wide SNP-marker genotypes

被引:23
作者
Akanno, Everestus C. [1 ]
Abo-Ismail, Mohammed K. [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Liuhong [1 ]
Crowley, John J. [1 ,3 ]
Wang, Zhiquan [1 ]
Li, Changxi [1 ,4 ]
Basarab, John A. [1 ,5 ]
MacNeil, Michael D. [1 ,6 ,7 ]
Plastow, Graham S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Agr Food & Nutr Sci, Livestock Gentec, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Damanhour Univ, Dept Anim & Poultry Prod, Damanhour, Egypt
[3] Canadian Beef Breeds Council, 6815 8th St NE, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Lacombe Res & Dev Ctr, 6000 C&E Trail, Lacombe, AB, Canada
[5] Alberta Agr & Forestry, Lacombe Res Ctr, 6000 C&E Trail, Lacombe, AB, Canada
[6] Delta G, Miles City, MT USA
[7] Univ Free State, Dept Anim Wildlife & Grassland Sci, Bloemfontein, South Africa
关键词
beef cattle; dominance; genomics; growth and carcass traits; heterozygosity; hybrid vigour; FEED-EFFICIENCY; PRODUCTION TRAITS; GROWTH; WEIGHT; BREED; DOMINANCE; VARIANCE; PREDICTION; CARCASS; CROSSES;
D O I
10.1093/jas/skx002
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
An objective of commercial beef cattle crossbreeding programs is to simultaneously optimize use of additive (breed differences) and non-additive (heterosis) effects. A total of 6,794 multibreed and crossbred beef cattle with phenotype and Illumina BovineSNP50 genotype data were used to predict genomic heterosis for growth and carcass traits by applying two methods assumed to be linearly proportional to heterosis. The methods were as follows: 1) retained heterozygosity predicted from genomic breed fractions (HET1) and 2) deviation of adjusted crossbred phenotype from midparent value (HET2). Comparison of methods was based on prediction accuracy from cross-validation. Here, a mutually exclusive random sampling of all crossbred animals (n = 5,327) was performed to form five groups replicated five times with approximately 1,065 animals per group. In each run within a replicate, one group was assigned as a validation set, while the remaining four groups were combined to form the reference set. The phenotype of the animals in the validation set was assumed to be unknown; thus, it resulted in every animal having heterosis values that were predicted without using its own phenotype, allowing their adjusted phenotype to be used for validation. The same approach was used to test the impact of predicted heterosis on accuracy of genomic breeding values (GBV). The results showed positive heterotic effects for growth traits but not for carcass traits that reflect the importance of heterosis for growth traits in beef cattle. Heterosis predicted by HET1 method resulted in less variable estimates that were mostly within the range of estimates generated by HET2. Prediction accuracy was greater for HET2 (0.37-0.98) than HET1 (0.34-0.43). Proper consideration of heterosis in genomic evaluation models has debatable effects on accuracy of EBV predictions. However, opportunity exists for predicting heterosis, improving accuracy of genomic selection, and consequently optimizing crossbreeding programs in beef cattle.
引用
收藏
页码:830 / 845
页数:16
相关论文
共 47 条
[11]  
Dickerson G. E., 1973, Proceedings of the Animal Breeding and Genetics Symposium in honor of Dr. Jay L. Lush, held July 29, 1972, at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia., P54
[12]   Estimation of dominance variance for live body weight in a crossbred population of pigs [J].
Dufrasne, M. ;
Faux, P. ;
Piedboeuf, M. ;
Wavreille, J. ;
Gengler, N. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2014, 92 (10) :4313-4318
[13]  
Falconer D.S., 1996, Quantitative Genetics, V4th
[14]  
Holland R., 2013, EXTENSION SP U TENNE, V755
[15]   Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance [J].
Ibanez-Escriche, Noelia ;
Fernando, Rohan L. ;
Toosi, Ali ;
Dekkers, Jack C. M. .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2009, 41
[16]  
Ihaka R., 1996, J. Comput. Graph Stat., V5, P299, DOI [DOI 10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713, 10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713, 10.2307/1390807]
[17]   Influence of sire by year interactions on the direct- maternal genetic correlation for weaning weight of Western Australian Merino sheep [J].
Konstantinov, KV ;
Brien, FD .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2003, 54 (07) :723-729
[18]  
Krishnan G. S., 2013, MOL MARKERS PLANTS
[19]   Predicting breed composition using breed frequencies of 50,000 markers from the US Meat Animal Research Center 2,000 Bull Project [J].
Kuehn, L. A. ;
Keele, J. W. ;
Bennett, G. L. ;
McDaneld, T. G. ;
Smith, T. P. L. ;
Snelling, W. M. ;
Sonstegard, T. S. ;
Thallman, R. M. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 89 (06) :1742-1750
[20]   Estimating Missing Heritability for Disease from Genome-wide Association Studies [J].
Lee, Sang Hong ;
Wray, Naomi R. ;
Goddard, Michael E. ;
Visscher, Peter M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2011, 88 (03) :294-305