Modeling heterotic effects in beef cattle using genome-wide SNP-marker genotypes

被引:23
作者
Akanno, Everestus C. [1 ]
Abo-Ismail, Mohammed K. [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Liuhong [1 ]
Crowley, John J. [1 ,3 ]
Wang, Zhiquan [1 ]
Li, Changxi [1 ,4 ]
Basarab, John A. [1 ,5 ]
MacNeil, Michael D. [1 ,6 ,7 ]
Plastow, Graham S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Agr Food & Nutr Sci, Livestock Gentec, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Damanhour Univ, Dept Anim & Poultry Prod, Damanhour, Egypt
[3] Canadian Beef Breeds Council, 6815 8th St NE, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Lacombe Res & Dev Ctr, 6000 C&E Trail, Lacombe, AB, Canada
[5] Alberta Agr & Forestry, Lacombe Res Ctr, 6000 C&E Trail, Lacombe, AB, Canada
[6] Delta G, Miles City, MT USA
[7] Univ Free State, Dept Anim Wildlife & Grassland Sci, Bloemfontein, South Africa
关键词
beef cattle; dominance; genomics; growth and carcass traits; heterozygosity; hybrid vigour; FEED-EFFICIENCY; PRODUCTION TRAITS; GROWTH; WEIGHT; BREED; DOMINANCE; VARIANCE; PREDICTION; CARCASS; CROSSES;
D O I
10.1093/jas/skx002
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
An objective of commercial beef cattle crossbreeding programs is to simultaneously optimize use of additive (breed differences) and non-additive (heterosis) effects. A total of 6,794 multibreed and crossbred beef cattle with phenotype and Illumina BovineSNP50 genotype data were used to predict genomic heterosis for growth and carcass traits by applying two methods assumed to be linearly proportional to heterosis. The methods were as follows: 1) retained heterozygosity predicted from genomic breed fractions (HET1) and 2) deviation of adjusted crossbred phenotype from midparent value (HET2). Comparison of methods was based on prediction accuracy from cross-validation. Here, a mutually exclusive random sampling of all crossbred animals (n = 5,327) was performed to form five groups replicated five times with approximately 1,065 animals per group. In each run within a replicate, one group was assigned as a validation set, while the remaining four groups were combined to form the reference set. The phenotype of the animals in the validation set was assumed to be unknown; thus, it resulted in every animal having heterosis values that were predicted without using its own phenotype, allowing their adjusted phenotype to be used for validation. The same approach was used to test the impact of predicted heterosis on accuracy of genomic breeding values (GBV). The results showed positive heterotic effects for growth traits but not for carcass traits that reflect the importance of heterosis for growth traits in beef cattle. Heterosis predicted by HET1 method resulted in less variable estimates that were mostly within the range of estimates generated by HET2. Prediction accuracy was greater for HET2 (0.37-0.98) than HET1 (0.34-0.43). Proper consideration of heterosis in genomic evaluation models has debatable effects on accuracy of EBV predictions. However, opportunity exists for predicting heterosis, improving accuracy of genomic selection, and consequently optimizing crossbreeding programs in beef cattle.
引用
收藏
页码:830 / 845
页数:16
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Assessing genetic diversity in Canadian beef cattle populations using Illumina BovineSNP50 chip [J].
Abo-Ismail, M. K. ;
Akanno, E. C. ;
Khorshidi, R. ;
Crowley, J. ;
Chen, L. ;
Karisa, B. K. ;
Li, X. ;
Wang, Z. ;
Basarab, J. ;
Li, C. ;
Stothard, P. ;
Plastow, G. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 :148-149
[2]   Genomic prediction of breed composition and heterosis effects in Angus, Charolais, and Hereford crosses using 50K genotypes [J].
Akanno, E. C. ;
Chen, L. ;
Abo-Ismail, M. K. ;
Crowley, J. J. ;
Wang, Z. ;
Li, C. ;
Basarab, J. A. ;
MacNeil, M. D. ;
Plastow, G. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2017, 97 (03) :431-438
[3]   Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals [J].
Alexander, David H. ;
Novembre, John ;
Lange, Kenneth .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2009, 19 (09) :1655-1664
[4]   Prediction of heterosis using genome-wide SNP-marker data: application to egg production traits in white Leghorn crosses [J].
Amuzu-Aweh, E. N. ;
Bijma, P. ;
Kinghorn, B. P. ;
Vereijken, A. ;
Visscher, J. ;
van Arendonk, J. A. M. ;
Bovenhuis, H. .
HEREDITY, 2013, 111 (06) :530-538
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ASREML USER GUIDE RE
[6]  
Arango JA, 2002, J ANIM SCI, V80, P3133
[7]   Non-additive genetic variation in growth, carcass and fertility traits of beef cattle [J].
Bolormaa, Sunduimijid ;
Pryce, Jennie E. ;
Zhang, Yuandan ;
Reverter, Antonio ;
Barendse, William ;
Hayes, Ben J. ;
Goddard, Michael E. .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2015, 47
[8]   Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle [J].
Chen, L. ;
Schenkel, F. ;
Vinsky, M. ;
Crews, D. H., Jr. ;
Li, C. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (10) :4669-4678
[9]   Modeling and analysis of the potential impacts on regional climate due to vegetation degradation over arid and semi-arid regions of China [J].
Chen, Liang ;
Ma, Zhuguo ;
Zhao, Tianbao .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2017, 144 (03) :461-473
[10]  
Cleveland MA, 2005, J ANIM SCI, V83, P992