Civil Society Organizations at the Gates? A Gatekeeping Study of News Making Efforts by NGOs and Government Institutions

被引:29
作者
Van Leuven, Sarah [1 ]
Joye, Stijn [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Translat Interpreting & Commun, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Commun Sci, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
global civil society; agenda building; NGOs; news access; public sphere; PUBLIC-RELATIONS; NETWORKS; CREDIBILITY; AGENDA; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1177/1940161213514615
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This article applies a combination of an input-output content analysis and in-depth interviews with nongovernmental organization (NGO) communication professionals to determine whether the growing incorporation of press releases in editorial print content could be a new public forum through which international political actors, such as NGOs, could gain wider news access by serving as emerging key players in global civil society. The study indicates that Belgian news coverage of international aid issues is more often based on NGO press releases than government press releases. We also found that the agenda-building capacities of NGOs and government institutions are enhanced as journalists present information subsidies as original journalistic work in most cases. Nonetheless, we must tone down prevailing one-sided conclusions, as most press releases are not just copy-pasted. Instead, most are supplemented with additional sources and information. The data, moreover, identify different journalistic roles of NGOs according to their objectives. While some issue press releases to raise short-term public awareness and donations for humanitarian crises (mobilization), others have developed into established expert news source organizations that provide background information and reliable eyewitness accounts to journalists.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 180
页数:21
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Taking the state out of state-media relations theory: how transnational advocacy networks are changing the press-state dynamic [J].
Aday, Sean ;
Livingston, Steven .
MEDIA WAR AND CONFLICT, 2008, 1 (01) :99-107
[2]  
[Anonymous], J HUMANITARIAN ASSIS
[3]  
Blumler JayG., 2005, MASS MEDIA SOC, P104
[4]   Online political debate, unbounded citizenship, and the problematic nature of a transnational public sphere [J].
Cammaerts, B ;
Van Audenhove, L .
POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 2005, 22 (02) :179-196
[5]  
Castells M., 2010, MEDIA SOC, P3
[6]   The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance [J].
Castells, Manuel .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2008, 616 :78-93
[7]  
Cottle S., 2000, JOURNALISM STUD, V1, P427, DOI [10.1080/14616700050081768, DOI 10.1080/14616700050081768]
[8]  
Cottle S., 2007, Journalism Studies, V8, P862, DOI DOI 10.1080/14616700701556104
[9]  
Curran J., 2010, RETHINKING COMMUNICA, P8
[10]  
Curtin P.A., 1999, Journal of Public Relations Research, V11, P53