Effect of farming strategies on environmental impact of intensive dairy farms in Italy

被引:64
作者
Guerci, Matteo [1 ]
Bava, Luciana [1 ]
Zucali, Maddalena [1 ]
Sandrucci, Anna [1 ]
Penati, Chiara [1 ]
Tamburini, Alberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dipartimento Sci Agr & Ambientali, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
Dairy farm; milk; sustainability; Life Cycle Assessment; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ORGANIC MILK-PRODUCTION; CARBON FOOTPRINT; NEW-ZEALAND; CATTLE; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEMS; MODEL; BEEF;
D O I
10.1017/S0022029913000277
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Agriculture and animal husbandry are important contributors to global emissions of greenhouse (GHG) and acidifying gases. Moreover, they contribute to water pollution and to consumption of non-renewable natural resources such as land and energy. The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology allows evaluation of the environmental impact of a process from the production of inputs to the final product and to assess simultaneously several environmental impact categories among which GHG emissions, acidification, eutrophication, land use and energy use. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate, using the LCA methodology, the environmental impact of milk production in a sample of 41 intensive Italian dairy farms and to identify, among different farming strategies, those associated with the best environmental performances. The functional unit was 1 kg Fat and Protein Corrected Milk (FPCM). Farms showed characteristics of high production intensity: FPCM, expressed as tonnes per hectare, was 30.8 +/- 15.1. Total GHG emission per kg FPCM at farm gate was 1.30 +/- 0.19 kg CO2 eq. The main contributors to climate change potential were emissions from barns and manure storage (50.1%) and emissions for production and transportation of purchased feeds (21.2%). Average emission of gases causing acidification to produce 1 kg FPCM was 19.7 +/- 3.6 g of SO2 eq. Eutrophication potential was 9.01 +/- 1.78 PO43- eq: per kg FPCM on average. Farms from this study needed on average 5.97 +/- 1.32 MJ per kg FPCM from non-renewable energy sources. Energy consumption was mainly due to off-farm activities (58%) associated with purchased factors. Land use was 1.51 +/- 0.25 m(2) per kg FPCM. The farming strategy based on high conversion efficiency at animal level was identified as the most effective to mitigate the environmental impact per kg milk at farm gate, especially in terms of GHG production and non-renewable energy use per kg FPCM.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 308
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EC DAT V 2 0
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, EMEP EEA AIR POLL EM
[3]   Estimating greenhouse gas emissions from New Zealand dairy systems using a mechanistic whole farm model and inventory methodology [J].
Beukes, P. C. ;
Gregorini, P. ;
Romera, A. J. .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 166-67 :708-720
[4]   Methods to Estimate On-Field Nitrogen Emissions from Crop Production as an Input to LCA Studies in the Agricultural Sector [J].
Brentrup, Frank ;
Kuesters, Juergen ;
Lammel, Joachim ;
Kuhlmann, Hermann .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2000, 5 (06) :349-357
[5]   The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944 compared with 2007 [J].
Capper, J. L. ;
Cady, R. A. ;
Bauman, D. E. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2009, 87 (06) :2160-2167
[6]   Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from the average Irish milk production system [J].
Casey, JW ;
Holden, NM .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2005, 86 (01) :97-114
[7]   The environmental performance of milk production on a typical Portuguese dairy farm [J].
Castanheira, E. G. ;
Dias, A. C. ;
Arroja, L. ;
Amaro, R. .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2010, 103 (07) :498-507
[8]  
Cederberg C., 2000, J CLEAN PROD, V8, P49, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0959-6526(99)00311-X
[9]   Environmental impact assessment of conventional and organic milk production [J].
de Boer, IJM .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2003, 80 (1-2) :69-77
[10]  
De Klein Cecile., 2006, 2006 IPCC GUIDELINES, P1