Optimization over state feedback policies for robust control with constraints

被引:430
作者
Goulart, PJ
Kerrigan, EC
Maciejowski, JA
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Aeronaut, London SW7 2AZ, England
[3] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, London SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
robust control; constraint satisfaction; robust optimization; predictive control; optimal control;
D O I
10.1016/j.automatica.2005.08.023
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper is concerned with the optimal control of linear discrete-time systems subject to unknown but bounded state disturbances and mixed polytopic constraints on the state and input. It is shown that the class of admissible affine state feedback control policies with knowledge of prior states is equivalent to the class of admissible feedback policies that are affine functions of the past disturbance sequence. This implies that a broad class of constrained finite horizon robust and optimal control problems, where the optimization is over affine state feedback policies, can be solved in a computationally efficient fashion using convex optimization methods. This equivalence result is used to design a robust receding horizon control (RHC) state feedback policy such that the closed-loop system is input-to-state stable (ISS) and the constraints are satisfied for all time and all allowable disturbance sequences. The cost to be minimized in the associated finite horizon optimal control problem is quadratic in the disturbance-free state and input sequences. The value of the receding horizon control law can be calculated at each sample instant using a single, tractable and convex quadratic program (QP) if the disturbance set is polytopic, or a tractable second-order cone program (SOCP) if the disturbance set is given by a 2-norm bound. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 533
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   The explicit linear quadratic regulator for constrained systems [J].
Bemporad, A ;
Morari, M ;
Dua, V ;
Pistikopoulos, EN .
AUTOMATICA, 2002, 38 (01) :3-20
[2]  
Bemporad A, 1998, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P1384, DOI 10.1109/CDC.1998.758479
[3]   Adjustable robust solutions of uncertain linear programs [J].
Ben-Tal, A ;
Goryashko, A ;
Guslitzer, E ;
Nemirovski, A .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 2004, 99 (02) :351-376
[4]  
Bertsekas D, 2003, Convex Analysis and Optimization, V1
[5]   SUFFICIENTLY INFORMATIVE FUNCTIONS AND MINIMAX FEEDBACK CONTROL OF UNCERTAIN DYNAMIC-SYSTEMS [J].
BERTSEKAS, DP ;
RHODES, IB .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1973, AC18 (02) :117-123
[6]   Set invariance in control [J].
Blanchini, F .
AUTOMATICA, 1999, 35 (11) :1747-1767
[7]  
Dahleh M.A., 1995, Control of Uncertain Systems: a Linear Programming Approach
[8]  
Garstka S. J., 1974, Mathematical Programming, V7, P117, DOI 10.1007/BF01585511
[9]  
Goulart P. J., 2005, P 16 IFAC WORLD C AU
[10]  
Guslitser E, 2002, THESIS ISRAELI I TEC