Development and validation of the neck dissection impairment index - A quality of life measure

被引:125
作者
Taylor, RJ
Chepcha, JC
Teknos, TN
Bradford, CR
Sharma, PK
Terrell, JE
Hogikyan, ND
Wolf, GT
Chepeha, DB
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Taubman Ctr 1904, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Alberta, Glen Sather Sports Med Clin, Dept Phys Therapy, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archotol.128.1.44
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: To validate a health-related quality-of-life (QOL) instrument for patients following neck dissection and to identify the factors that affect QOL following neck dissection. Design: Cross-sectional validation study. Setting: The outpatient clinic of a tertiary care cancer center. Patients: Convenience sample of 54 patients previously treated for head and neck cancer who underwent a selective neck dissection or modified radical neck dissection (64 total neck dissections). Patients had a minimum postoperative convalescence of 11 months. Thirty-two underwent accessory nerve-sparing modified radical neck dissection, and 32 underwent selective neck dissection. Main Outcome Measure: A 10-item, self-report instrument, the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII), was developed and validated. Reliability was evaluated with test-retest correlation and internal consistency was assessed using the 36-Item Short-Form. Health Survey (SF-36) and the Constant Shoulder Scale, a shoulder function test. Multiple variable regression was used to determine variables that most affected QOL following neck dissection Results: The 10-item NDII test-retest correlation was 0.91 (P<.001) with an internal consistency Cronbach α coefficient of .95. The NDII correlated with the Constant Shoulder Scale (r=0.85, P<.001) and with the SF-36 physical functioning (r=0.50, P<.001) and role-physical functioning (r=0.60, P<.001) domains. Using multiple variable regression, the variables that contributed most to QOL score were patient's age and weight, radiation treatment, and neck dissection type. Conclusions: The NDII is a valid, reliable instrument for assessing neck dissection impairment. Patient's age, weight, radiation treatment, and neck dissection type were important factors that affect QOL following neck dissection.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 49
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[11]   SHOULDER PAIN AND FUNCTION AFTER NECK DISSECTION WITH OR WITHOUT PRESERVATION OF THE SPINAL ACCESSORY NERVE [J].
SHORT, SO ;
KAPLAN, JN ;
LARAMORE, GE ;
CUMMINGS, CW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1984, 148 (04) :478-482
[12]   OBJECTIVE COMPARISON OF PHYSICAL DYSFUNCTION AFTER NECK DISSECTION [J].
SOBOL, S ;
JENSEN, C ;
SAWYER, W ;
COSTILOE, P ;
THONG, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1985, 150 (04) :503-509
[13]   INNERVATION OF THE TRAPEZIUS MUSCLE - A STUDY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING NECK DISSECTIONS [J].
SOO, KC ;
GUILOF, RJ ;
OH, A ;
DELLAROVERE, GQ ;
WESTBURY, G .
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 1990, 12 (06) :488-495
[14]   Pain, quality of life, and spinal accessory nerve status after neck dissection [J].
Terrell, JE ;
Welsh, DE ;
Bradford, CR ;
Chepeha, DB ;
Esclamado, RM ;
Hogikyan, ND ;
Wolf, GT .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2000, 110 (04) :620-626
[15]   Current concepts - Assessment of quality-of-life outcomes [J].
Testa, MA ;
Simonson, DC .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (13) :835-840
[16]  
Ware J.E., 2003, SF 36 HLTH SURVEY MA
[17]   THE MOS 36-ITEM SHORT-FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF-36) .1. CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK AND ITEM SELECTION [J].
WARE, JE ;
SHERBOURNE, CD .
MEDICAL CARE, 1992, 30 (06) :473-483