Development and validation of the neck dissection impairment index - A quality of life measure

被引:125
作者
Taylor, RJ
Chepcha, JC
Teknos, TN
Bradford, CR
Sharma, PK
Terrell, JE
Hogikyan, ND
Wolf, GT
Chepeha, DB
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Taubman Ctr 1904, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Alberta, Glen Sather Sports Med Clin, Dept Phys Therapy, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archotol.128.1.44
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: To validate a health-related quality-of-life (QOL) instrument for patients following neck dissection and to identify the factors that affect QOL following neck dissection. Design: Cross-sectional validation study. Setting: The outpatient clinic of a tertiary care cancer center. Patients: Convenience sample of 54 patients previously treated for head and neck cancer who underwent a selective neck dissection or modified radical neck dissection (64 total neck dissections). Patients had a minimum postoperative convalescence of 11 months. Thirty-two underwent accessory nerve-sparing modified radical neck dissection, and 32 underwent selective neck dissection. Main Outcome Measure: A 10-item, self-report instrument, the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII), was developed and validated. Reliability was evaluated with test-retest correlation and internal consistency was assessed using the 36-Item Short-Form. Health Survey (SF-36) and the Constant Shoulder Scale, a shoulder function test. Multiple variable regression was used to determine variables that most affected QOL following neck dissection Results: The 10-item NDII test-retest correlation was 0.91 (P<.001) with an internal consistency Cronbach α coefficient of .95. The NDII correlated with the Constant Shoulder Scale (r=0.85, P<.001) and with the SF-36 physical functioning (r=0.50, P<.001) and role-physical functioning (r=0.60, P<.001) domains. Using multiple variable regression, the variables that contributed most to QOL score were patient's age and weight, radiation treatment, and neck dissection type. Conclusions: The NDII is a valid, reliable instrument for assessing neck dissection impairment. Patient's age, weight, radiation treatment, and neck dissection type were important factors that affect QOL following neck dissection.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 49
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CLIN TRIALS PRACTICA
[2]  
CONSTANT CR, 1987, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P160
[3]  
Gliklich RE, 1997, HEAD NECK-J SCI SPEC, V19, P474, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0347(199709)19:6<474::AID-HED3>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-W
[5]   FUNCTIONAL-EVALUATION OF THE SPINAL ACCESSORY NERVE AFTER NECK DISSECTION [J].
LEIPZIG, B ;
SUEN, JY ;
ENGLISH, JL ;
BARNES, J ;
HOOPER, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1983, 146 (04) :526-530
[6]  
NAHUM AM, 1961, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V74, P82
[7]  
PEDHAZUR E, 1991, MEASUREMENT DESIGN A
[8]  
REMMLER D, 1986, HEAD NECK SURG, V8, P280
[9]   ANALYSIS OF DISABILITY RESULTING FROM TREATMENT INCLUDING RADICAL NECK DISSECTION OR MODIFIED NECK DISSECTION [J].
SCHULLER, DE ;
REICHES, NA ;
HAMAKER, RC ;
LINGEMAN, RE ;
WEISBERGER, EC ;
SUEN, JY ;
CONLEY, JJ ;
KELLY, DR ;
MIGLETS, AW .
HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1983, 6 (01) :551-558
[10]   AN AUDIT INTO THE INCIDENCE OF HANDICAP AFTER UNILATERAL RADICAL NECK DISSECTION [J].
SHONE, GR ;
YARDLEY, MPJ .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1991, 105 (09) :760-762