On the calculation of percentile-based bibliometric indicators

被引:119
作者
Waltman, Ludo [1 ]
Schreiber, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Ctr Sci & Technol Studies, NL-2300 AX Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Tech Univ Chemnitz, Inst Phys, D-09126 Chemnitz, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY | 2013年 / 64卷 / 02期
关键词
citation analysis; SCIENTIFIC EXCELLENCE; IMPACT INDICATORS; CITATION IMPACT; POLICY;
D O I
10.1002/asi.22775
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A percentile-based bibliometric indicator is an indicator that values publications based on their position within the citation distribution of their field. The most straightforward percentile-based indicator is the proportion of frequently cited publications, for instance, the proportion of publications that belong to the top 10% most frequently cited of their field. Recently, more complex percentile-based indicators have been proposed. A difficulty in the calculation of percentile-based indicators is caused by the discrete nature of citation distributions combined with the presence of many publications with the same number of citations. We introduce an approach to calculating percentile-based indicators that deals with this difficulty in a more satisfactory way than earlier approaches suggested in the literature. We show in a formal mathematical framework that our approach leads to indicators that do not suffer from biases in favor of or against particular fields of science.
引用
收藏
页码:372 / 379
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, An introduction to the bootstrap
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Science and Engineering Indicators 2012
[3]   The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011 [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
de Moya Anegon, Felix ;
Leydesdorff, Loet .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2012, 6 (02) :333-335
[4]   Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance: The avoidance of citation (ratio) averages in field-normalization [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Mutz, Ruediger .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2011, 5 (01) :228-230
[5]   The effects and their stability of field normalization baseline on relative performance with respect to citation impact: A case study of 20 natural science departments [J].
Colliander, Cristian ;
Ahlgren, Per .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2011, 5 (01) :101-113
[6]   Fair assessment of the merits of psychiatric research [J].
Lewison, Grant ;
Thornicroft, Graham ;
Szmukler, George ;
Tansella, Michele .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 190 :314-318
[7]  
Leydesdorff L., J AM SOC IN IN PRESS
[8]   Percentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator (I3) [J].
Leydesdorff, Loet ;
Bornmann, Lutz .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 63 (09) :1901-1902
[9]   Integrated Impact Indicators Compared With Impact Factors: An Alternative Research Design With Policy Implications [J].
Leydesdorff, Loet ;
Bornmann, Lutz .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 62 (11) :2133-2146
[10]   Turning the Tables on Citation Analysis One More Time: Principles for Comparing Sets of Documents [J].
Leydesdorff, Loet ;
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Mutz, Ruediger ;
Opthof, Tobias .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 62 (07) :1370-1381