Prostate Cancer That Is Within 0.1 mm of the Surgical Margin of a Radical Prostatectomy Predicts Greater Likelihood of Recurrence

被引:18
作者
Izard, Jason P. [1 ]
True, Lawrence D. [2 ]
May, Philip [1 ]
Ellis, William J. [1 ]
Lange, Paul H. [1 ]
Dalkin, Bruce [1 ]
Lin, Daniel W. [1 ]
Schmidt, Rodney A. [2 ]
Wright, Jonathan L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Urol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Pathol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
radical prostatectomy; prostate cancer; surgical margins; ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; ANTIGEN RECURRENCE; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; INTERNATIONAL-SOCIETY; RESECTION MARGIN; POSITIVE MARGINS; PROGRESSION; SPECIMENS; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/PAS.0000000000000162
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Surgical margin status at prostatectomy is an important predictor of biochemical recurrence (BCR). The current convention is to categorize a margin as negative if tumor cells are not at the inked margin, even if they are within a few cells of the margin. We hypothesized that cancer within 0.1 mm of the margin conferred an increased risk for BCR. We determined the risk for BCR on the bass of surgical margin status in a cohort of 1588 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (PCa) between 1998 and 2011. Surgical margins were categorized as positive, close (< 0.1 mm from tumor cells), or negative. Multivariate hazard ratios (HRs) for BCR were determined by margin status. We identified 1588 patients, of whom 193 had PCa recurrence. The margin status was negative in 1058 (67%), close in 232 (15%), and positive in 298 (19%). Cancer that was close to the margin was a significant and independent predictor of BCR (HR 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-2.32) and was not statistically different than a positive surgical margin (HR 2.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-2.99). Cancer that is within 0.1 mm of the surgical margin of a prostatectomy is associated with an increased risk for PCa recurrence. Patients with that margin status may be reasonable candidates for adjuvant local therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 338
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy Differs by Disease Risk Group
    Alkhateeb, Sultan
    Alibhai, Shabbir
    Fleshner, Neil
    Finelli, Antonio
    Jewett, Michael
    Zlotta, Alexandre
    Nesbitt, Michael
    Lockwood, Gina
    Trachtenberg, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (01) : 145 - 150
  • [2] Long-term hazard of progression after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: Continued rise of biochemical failure after 5 years
    Amling, CL
    Blute, ML
    Bergstralh, EJ
    Seay, TM
    Slezak, J
    Zincke, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (01) : 101 - 105
  • [3] The natural history of metastatic progression in men with prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: long-term follow-up
    Antonarakis, Emmanuel S.
    Feng, Zhaoyong
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Humphreys, Elizabeth B.
    Carducci, Michael A.
    Partin, Alan W.
    Walsh, Patrick C.
    Eisenberger, Mario A.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (01) : 32 - 39
  • [4] Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer
    Bernstein, T. E.
    Endreseth, B. H.
    Romundstad, P.
    Wibe, A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (11) : 1348 - 1357
  • [5] Evaluation of modern pathological criteria for positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens and their use for predicting biochemical recurrence
    Bong, Gary W.
    Ritenour, Chad W. M.
    Osunkoya, Adeboye O.
    Smith, M. Timothy
    Keane, Thomas E.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 103 (03) : 327 - 331
  • [6] The Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Mortality Following Radical Prostatectomy During the Prostate Specific Antigen Era
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Crispen, Paul L.
    Carlson, Rachel E.
    Rangel, Laureano J.
    Bergstralh, Eric J.
    Blute, Michael L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (03) : 1003 - 1009
  • [7] Pretreatment nomogram for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    D'Amico, AV
    Whittington, R
    Malkowicz, SB
    Fondurulia, J
    Chen, MH
    Kaplan, I
    Beard, CJ
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Renshaw, AA
    Wein, A
    Coleman, CN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (01) : 168 - 172
  • [8] Preoperative PSA velocity and the risk of death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy
    D'Amico, AV
    Chen, MH
    Roehl, KA
    Catalona, WJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (02) : 125 - 135
  • [9] Closest distance between tumor and resection margin in radical prostatectomy specimens - Lack of prognostic significance
    Emerson, RE
    Koch, MO
    Daggy, JK
    Cheng, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (02) : 225 - 229
  • [10] The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma
    Epstein, JI
    Allsbrook, WC
    Amin, MB
    Egevad, LL
    Bastacky, S
    Beltrán, AL
    Berner, A
    Billis, A
    Boccon-Gibod, L
    Cheng, L
    Civantos, F
    Cohen, C
    Cohen, MB
    Datta, M
    Davis, C
    Delahunt, B
    Delprado, W
    Eble, JN
    Foster, CS
    Furusato, M
    Gaudin, PB
    Grignon, DJ
    Humphrey, PA
    Iczkowski, KA
    Jones, EC
    Lucia, S
    McCue, PA
    Nazeer, T
    Oliva, E
    Pan, CC
    Pizov, G
    Reuter, V
    Samaratunga, H
    Sebo, T
    Sesterhenn, I
    Shevchuk, M
    Srigley, JR
    Suzigan, S
    Takahashi, H
    Tamboli, P
    Tan, PH
    Têtu, B
    Tickoo, S
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Troncoso, P
    Tsuzuki, T
    True, LD
    van der Kwast, T
    Wheeler, TM
    Wojno, KJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (09) : 1228 - 1242