Marginal Discrepancy of Monolithic and Veneered All-Ceramic Crowns on Titanium and Zirconia Implant Abutments Before and After Adhesive Cementation: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis

被引:39
作者
Martinez-Rus, Francisco [1 ]
Ferreiroa, Alberto [1 ]
Oezcan, Mutlu [2 ]
Pradies, Guillermo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Odontol, Dept Buccofacial Prostheses, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Zurich, Clin Fixed & Removable Prosthodont & Dent Mat Sci, Ctr Dent & Oral Med, Dent Mat Unit, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
all-ceramic systems; cement-retained prostheses; custom abutment; implant-supported prostheses; lithium disilicate; marginal adaptation; yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal; PARTIALLY-STABILIZED ZIRCONIA; FIXED DENTAL PROSTHESES; SINGLE-TOOTH IMPLANTS; FILM THICKNESS; ORAL IMPLANTS; SOFT-TISSUES; FIT; AESTHETICS; COPINGS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.2759
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the marginal discrepancy of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic crown systems cemented on titanium (Ti) and zirconia implant abutments. Material and Methods: Sixty customized implant abutments for a maxillary right central incisor were fabricated of Ti and zirconia (n = 30 of each) for an internal-connection implant system. All-ceramic crowns were fabricated using the following systems (n = 10 per group): monolithic with computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture (CAD/CAM) lithium disilicate (MLD), pressed lithium disilicate (PLD), or CAD yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP). The frameworks of the PLD and Y-TZP systems were manually veneered with a fluorapatite-based ceramic. The crowns were cemented to their implant abutments, and the absolute marginal discrepancy of the gap was measured before and after cementation. Data were analyzed statistically. Results: Marginal discrepancies were significantly influenced by the crown system and by cementation, but the material did not significantly affect the results. Interaction terms were not significant. Y-TZP crowns on both Ti and zirconia abutments presented the smallest mean marginal discrepancies before (52.1 +/- 17 mu m and 56.2 +/- 11 mu m, respectively) and after cementation (98.7 +/- 17 mu m and 101.8 +/- 16 mu m, respectively). Before cementation, MLD crowns showed significantly larger mean marginal openings than PLD crowns on both Ti and zirconia abutments (75.2 +/- 12 and 77.5 +/- 13 mu m for MLD, 52.1 +/- 17 mu m and 69.7 +/- 8 mu m for PLD, respectively). After cementation, both Ti and zirconia abutments with MLD crowns (113.5 +/- 12 mu m and 118.3 +/- 14 mu m, respectively) showed significantly larger values than with PLD crowns (98.7 +/- 17 mu m and 109.4 +/- 9 mu m, respectively). Conclusions: Manually veneered Y-TZP crowns demonstrated more favorable marginal fit on both Ti and zirconia implant abutments before and after cementation compared to those of MLD and PLD.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 487
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, DENT MATER
[2]   Marginal Adaptation of All-Ceramic Crowns on Implant Abutments [J].
Att, Wael ;
Hoischen, Tomas ;
Gerds, Thomas ;
Strub, Joerg Rudolf .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2008, 10 (04) :218-225
[3]   MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF THREE DIFFERENT ZIRCONIUM DIOXIDE THREE-UNIT FIXED DENTAL PROSTHESES [J].
Att, Wael ;
Komine, Futoshii ;
Gerds, Thomas ;
Strub, Joerg Rudolf .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2009, 101 (04) :239-247
[4]   EVALUATION OF THE MARGINAL FIT OF A ZIRCONIA CERAMIC COMPUTER-AIDED MACHINED (CAM) CROWN SYSTEM [J].
Baig, Mirza Rustum ;
Tan, Keson Beng-Choon ;
Nicholls, Jack I. .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2010, 104 (04) :216-227
[5]   Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth [J].
Beschnidt, SM ;
Strub, JR .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1999, 26 (07) :582-593
[6]   MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES AND SHORT-TERM INVIVO EVALUATION OF YTTRIUM-OXIDE-PARTIALLY-STABILIZED ZIRCONIA [J].
CHRISTEL, P ;
MEUNIER, A ;
HELLER, M ;
TORRE, JP ;
PEILLE, CN .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1989, 23 (01) :45-61
[7]  
Coli P, 2004, INT J PROSTHODONT, V17, P577
[8]   Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: A systematic review [J].
Conrad, Heather J. ;
Seong, Wook-Jin ;
Pesun, Gor J. .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2007, 98 (05) :389-404
[9]  
Cooper LF, 2007, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V22, P791
[10]   The Peri-Implant Sulcus Compared with Internal Implant and Suprastructure Components: A Microbiological Analysis [J].
Cosyn, Jan ;
Van Aelst, Louis ;
Collaert, Bruno ;
Persson, G. Rutger ;
De Bruyn, Hugo .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (04) :286-295