Perineural invasion on biopsy is associated with upstaging at radical prostatectomy in Gleason score 3+4=7 prostate cancer

被引:10
|
作者
Flood, Trevor A. [1 ]
Schieda, Nicola [2 ]
Keefe, Daniel T. [3 ]
Morash, Chris [3 ]
Bateman, Justin [1 ]
Mai, Kien T. [1 ]
Belanger, Eric C. [1 ]
Robertson, Susan J. [1 ]
Breau, Rodney H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Ottawa Hosp, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Ottawa Hosp, Dept Med Imaging, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Ottawa Hosp, Dept Urol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
active surveillance; Gleason grade; perineural invasion; prostate; prostate biopsy; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; METASTASIS; VALIDATION; CANDIDATES;
D O I
10.1111/pin.12467
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
This study assesses if perineural invasion (PNI) detected on biopsy with Gleason score (GS) 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer (PCa) is associated with upstaging/upgrading of disease after radical prostatectomy (RP). 154 patients with GS 3 + 4 = 7 PCa diagnosed from biopsy who underwent RP were assessed for PNI. The percentage of biopsy sites with PNI (% PNI) was also calculated. Pattern 4 morphologies (ill-defined glands [IDG], fused, cribriform, and glomerulations) were also assessed. Clinical information, GS and stage after RP were retrieved from the medical records. 45 % (69/154) of patients were upstaged (>= pT3) and 29 % (44/154) were upgraded to GS >3 + 4 = 7 after RP. 37 % (57/154) of patients had PNI which was associated with upstaging (RR 1.4; P = 0.04) but not upgrading (RR 0.9; P = 0.7). There was higher % PNI in upstaged patients (12.1 % +/- 1.8 vs. 7.1 % +/- 1.5, P = 0.03) with a significant correlation between % PNI and >= pT3 (r = 0.178, P = 0.027). After multivariate analysis, only cribriform formations were significantly associated with upstaging (P = 0.009). The presence of PNI in biopsies with GS 3 + 4 = 7 PCa is associated with upstaging at RP but is a weaker predictor of >= pT3 disease than cribriform morphology.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 632
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer on Needle Biopsy: Relation of Primary Pattern 3 or 4 to Pathological Stage and Progression After Radical Prostatectomy
    Amin, Ali
    Partin, Alan
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (04) : 1286 - 1290
  • [42] Patients with Biopsy Gleason Score 3+4 Are Not Appropriate Candidates for Active Surveillance
    Park, Juhyun
    Yoo, Sangjun
    Cho, Min Chul
    Jeong, Chorok
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    Kwak, Cheol
    Kim, Hyeon Hoe
    Jeong, Hyeon
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2020, 104 (3-4) : 199 - 204
  • [43] PI-RADS version 2 for prediction of pathological downgrading after radical prostatectomy: a preliminary study in patients with biopsy-proven Gleason Score 7 (3+4) prostate cancer
    Sungmin Woo
    Sang Youn Kim
    Joongyub Lee
    Seung Hyup Kim
    Jeong Yeon Cho
    European Radiology, 2016, 26 : 3580 - 3587
  • [44] Multiparametric 3T MRI for the prediction of pathological downgrading after radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-proven Gleason score 3 + 4 prostate cancer
    Tatsuo Gondo
    Hedvig Hricak
    Evis Sala
    Junting Zheng
    Chaya S. Moskowitz
    Melanie Bernstein
    James A. Eastham
    Hebert Alberto Vargas
    European Radiology, 2014, 24 : 3161 - 3170
  • [45] Influence of Biopsy Gleason Score on the Risk of Lymph Node Invasion in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
    Wenzel, Mike
    Preisser, Felix
    Hoeh, Benedikt
    Welte, Maria N.
    Humke, Clara
    Wittler, Clarissa
    Wuernschimmel, Christoph
    Becker, Andreas
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Chun, Felix K. H.
    Mandel, Philipp
    Kluth, Luis A.
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2021, 8
  • [46] Upgrade in Gleason score between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology indicates poor outcomes in prostate cancer
    Chen, Zheng
    Pang, Jun
    Wang, Jue
    Lu, Min-Hua
    Shi, Hui-Juan
    Chen, Jian-Ning
    Zhang, Hao
    Huang, Qun-Xiong
    Zhou, Fang-Jian
    Liu, Wei-Peng
    Yi, Xian-Ning
    Lu, Hao-Yuan
    Qian, Hui-Jun
    Zeng, Xian-Tao
    Yang, Jiang-Gen
    Zhou, Xing
    Liu, Jiu-Min
    Chen, Jun
    Gao, Xin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 9 (02): : 1578 - +
  • [47] Gleason Score and Lethal Prostate Cancer: Does 3+4=4+3?
    Stark, Jennifer R.
    Perner, Sven
    Stampfer, Meir J.
    Sinnott, Jennifer A.
    Finn, Stephen
    Eisenstein, Anna S.
    Ma, Jing
    Fiorentino, Michelangelo
    Kurth, Tobias
    Loda, Massimo
    Giovannucci, Edward L.
    Rubin, Mark A.
    Mucci, Lorelei A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (21) : 3459 - 3464
  • [48] Role of radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer of high Gleason score
    Tefilli, MV
    Gheiler, EL
    Tiguert, R
    Banerjee, M
    Sakr, W
    Grignon, D
    Wood, DP
    Pontes, JE
    PROSTATE, 1999, 39 (01) : 60 - 66
  • [49] 3+4=6? Implications of the stratification of localised Gleason 7 prostate cancer by number and percentage of positive biopsy cores in selecting patients for active surveillance
    Ruiz-Cerda, J. L.
    Lorenzo Soriano, L.
    Ramos-Soler, D.
    Marzullo-Zucchet, L.
    Loras Monfort, A.
    Boronat Tormo, F.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2018, 42 (02): : 103 - 113
  • [50] Can we expand active surveillance criteria to include biopsy Gleason 3+4 prostate cancer? A multi-institutional study of 2,323 patients
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Isbarn, Hendrik
    Briganti, Alberto
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Surcel, Christian I.
    Salomon, Laurent
    Freschi, Massimo
    Mirvald, Cristian
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    Jenkins, Anna
    Ost, Piet
    van Oort, Inge M.
    Yossepowitch, Ofer
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2015, 33 (02) : 71.e1 - 71.e9