Exemplary Professional Practice Through Nurse Peer Review

被引：17

作者：

Branowicki, Patricia ^{[1
]}

Driscoll, Margaret ^{[2
]}

Hickey, Patricia ^{[1
]}

Renaud, Kristen ^{[1
]}

Sporing, Eileen ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Childrens Hosp Boston, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Nursing Patient Serv, Nursing Patient Care Serv, Boston, MA 02115 USA

[2] Childrens Hosp Boston, Program Patient Safety & Qual, Boston, MA USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES | 2011年 / 26卷 / 02期

关键词：

Exemplary professional practice; Peer review; Nursing practice; QUALITY;

D O I：

10.1016/j.pedn.2010.12.009

中图分类号：

R47 [护理学];

学科分类号：

1011 ;

摘要：

The development and execution of a nurse peer review program to evaluate nursing practice associated with significant adverse events has resulted in systemic changes. Descriptive analyses were conducted for 23 peer-reviewed cases involving 41 RNs and 2 advanced practice nurses from 14 specialties over a 4-year period. Thematic analysis revealed four common event categories: assessment and monitoring, team communication, skin integrity, and vascular access. This approach demonstrates the impact of professional nurse accountability for improving the quality of care and may serve as an exemplar for professional practice. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：128 / 136

页数：9

共 50 条

[41] Peer review A safety and quality improvement initiative in a general practice
Rutherford, Angela
AUSTRALIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2011, 40 (1-2) : 30 - 32
[42] International peer review in undergraduate dentistry: enhancing reflective practice in an online community of practice
Gardner, K.
Bridges, S.
Walmsley, D.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2012, 16 (04) : 208 - 212
[43] Improving patient safety through voluntary peer review
Kluge, S.
Bause, H.
BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ, 2015, 58 (01) : 54 - 60
[44] Mehr Patientensicherheit durch freiwilliges intensivmedizinisches „Peer Review“Improving patient safety through voluntary peer review
S. Kluge
H. Bause
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, 2015, 58 (1) : 54 - 60
[45] The sociology of scientific validity: How professional networks shape judgement in peer review
Teplitskiy, Misha
Acuna, Daniel
Elamrani-Raoult, Aida
Kording, Konrad
Evans, James
RESEARCH POLICY, 2018, 47 (09) : 1825 - 1841
[46] Supporting argumentative essay writing through an online supported peer-review script
Latifi, Saeed
Noroozi, Omid
INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 58 (05) : 501 - 511
[47] Creative Process Journey and the Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools - How Are Design Students Evaluating This Practice Through Peer Review?
Pernencar, Claudia
Santos, Ruben D.
Barros, Goncalo
Ferreira, Elga
ADVANCES IN DESIGN AND DIGITAL COMMUNICATION V, DIGICOM 2024, 2025, 51 : 498 - 511
[48] Redefining the Practice of Peer Review Through Intelligent Automation-Part 3: Automated Report Analysis and Data Reconciliation
Reiner, Bruce I.
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2018, 31 (01) : 1 - 4
[49] The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review
Morey, Richard D.
Chambers, Christopher D.
Etchells, Peter J.
Harris, Christine R.
Hoekstra, Rink
Lakens, Daniel
Lewandowsky, Stephan
Morey, Candice Coker
Newman, Daniel P.
Schoenbrodt, Felix D.
Vanpaemel, Wolf
Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan
Zwaan, Rolf A.
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2016, 3 (01):
[50] Using theory and evidence to drive measurement of patient, nurse and organizational outcomes of professional nursing practice
Jeffs, Lianne
Sidani, Souraya
Rose, Donald
Espin, Sherry
Smith, Orla
Martin, Kirsten
Byer, Charlie
Fu, Kaiyan
Ferris, Ella
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2013, 19 (02) : 141 - 148

← 1 2 3 4 5 →