Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate

被引:144
作者
Robson, Michael [1 ]
Hartigan, Lucia [1 ]
Murphy, Martina [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Matern Hosp, Dublin 2, Ireland
关键词
caesarean section rates; Multidisciplinary Quality; Assurance Programme; 10 group classification; CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM; DELIVERY; TRENDS; POPULATION; REDUCE; BIRTHS;
D O I
10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.004
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Caesarean section rates continue to increase worldwide. The appropriate caesarean section rate remains a topic of debate among women and professionals. Evidence-based medicine has not provided an answer and depends on interpretation of the literature. Overall caesarean section rates are unhelpful, and caesarean section rates should not be judged in isolation from other outcomes and epidemiological characteristics. Better understanding of caesarean section rates, their consequences and their benefits will improve care, and enable learning between delivery units nationally and internationally. To achieve and maintain an appropriate caesarean section rate requires a Multidisciplinary Quality Assurance Programme in each delivery unit, recognising caesarean section rates as one of many factors that determine quality. Women will always choose the type of delivery that seems safest to them and their babies. Professionals need to monitor the quality of their practice continuously in a standardised way to ensure that women can make the right choice. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 308
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[31]   Medical audit using the Ten Group Classification System and its impact on the cesarean section rate [J].
Scarella, Anibal ;
Chamy, Veronica ;
Sepulveda, Marcela ;
Belizan, Jose M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2011, 154 (02) :136-140
[32]   Caesarean section among referred and self-referred birthing women: a cohort study from a tertiary hospital, northeastern Tanzania [J].
Sorbye, Ingvil K. ;
Vangen, Siri ;
Oneko, Olola ;
Sundby, Johanne ;
Bergsjo, Per .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2011, 11
[33]   Epidemiology and trends for Caesarean section births in New South Wales, Australia: A population-based study [J].
Stavrou, Efty P. ;
Ford, Jane B. ;
Shand, Antonia W. ;
Morris, Jonathan M. ;
Roberts, Christine L. .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2011, 11
[34]   Elective caesarean sections-risks to the infant [J].
Steer, Philip J. ;
Modi, Neena .
LANCET, 2009, 374 (9691) :675-676
[35]   Risk Adjustment for Inter-Hospital Comparison of Caesarean Delivery Rates in Low-Risk Deliveries [J].
Stivanello, Elisa ;
Rucci, Paola ;
Carretta, Elisa ;
Pieri, Giulia ;
Seghieri, Chiara ;
Nuti, Sabina ;
Declercq, Eugene ;
Taglioni, Martina ;
Fantini, Maria Pia .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (11)
[36]   Classifications for Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review [J].
Torloni, Maria Regina ;
Betran, Ana Pilar ;
Souza, Joao Paulo ;
Widmer, Mariana ;
Allen, Tomas ;
Gulmezoglu, Metin ;
Merialdi, Mario .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (01)
[37]   Beware: unnecessary caesarean sections may be hazardous [J].
Victora, CG ;
Barros, FC .
LANCET, 2006, 367 (9525) :1796-1797
[38]   Cesarean delivery on maternal request - Maternal and neonatal outcomes [J].
Visco, Anthony G. ;
Viswanathan, Meera ;
Lohr, Kathleen N. ;
Wechter, Mary Ellen ;
Gartlehner, Gerald ;
Wu, Jennifer M. ;
Palmieri, Rachel ;
Funk, Michele Jonsson ;
Lux, Linda ;
Swinson, Tammeka ;
Hartmann, Katherine .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (06) :1517-1529
[39]   What is natural? Deciding what to do and not to do in medicine and health care [J].
Wackerhausen, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 106 (11) :1109-1112
[40]   Choosing caesarean section [J].
Wagner, M .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9242) :1677-1680