Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate

被引:144
作者
Robson, Michael [1 ]
Hartigan, Lucia [1 ]
Murphy, Martina [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Matern Hosp, Dublin 2, Ireland
关键词
caesarean section rates; Multidisciplinary Quality; Assurance Programme; 10 group classification; CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM; DELIVERY; TRENDS; POPULATION; REDUCE; BIRTHS;
D O I
10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.004
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Caesarean section rates continue to increase worldwide. The appropriate caesarean section rate remains a topic of debate among women and professionals. Evidence-based medicine has not provided an answer and depends on interpretation of the literature. Overall caesarean section rates are unhelpful, and caesarean section rates should not be judged in isolation from other outcomes and epidemiological characteristics. Better understanding of caesarean section rates, their consequences and their benefits will improve care, and enable learning between delivery units nationally and internationally. To achieve and maintain an appropriate caesarean section rate requires a Multidisciplinary Quality Assurance Programme in each delivery unit, recognising caesarean section rates as one of many factors that determine quality. Women will always choose the type of delivery that seems safest to them and their babies. Professionals need to monitor the quality of their practice continuously in a standardised way to ensure that women can make the right choice. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 308
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[11]   Nulliparous term singleton vertex caesarean delivery rates [J].
Brennan, Donal J. ;
Robson, Michael S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 200 (05) :E8-E8
[12]   Safer childbirth: avoiding medical interventions for non-medical reasons [J].
Chong, Yap-Seng ;
Kwek, Kenneth Y. C. .
LANCET, 2010, 375 (9713) :440-442
[13]   Risk adjustment models for interhospital comparison of CS rates using Robson's ten group classification system and other socio-demographic and clinical variables [J].
Colais, Paola ;
Fantini, Maria P. ;
Fusco, Danilo ;
Carretta, Elisa ;
Stivanello, Elisa ;
Lenzi, Jacopo ;
Pieri, Giulia ;
Perucci, Carlo A. .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2012, 12
[14]   Using a Caesarean Section Classification System based on characteristics of the population as a way of monitoring obstetric practice [J].
Costa, Maria L. ;
Cecatti, Jose G. ;
Souza, Joao P. ;
Milanez, Helaine M. ;
Guelmezoglu, Metin A. .
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2010, 7
[15]   Limiting the caesarean section rate in low risk pregnancies is key to lowering the trend of increased abdominal deliveries: an observational study [J].
Delbaere, Ilse ;
Cammu, Hendrik ;
Martens, Evelyne ;
Tency, Inge ;
Martens, Guy ;
Temmerman, Marleen .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2012, 12
[16]   Cesarean delivery and the risk-benefit calculus [J].
Ecker, Jeffrey L. ;
Frigoletto, Fredric D., Jr. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (09) :885-888
[17]   Obstetricians' choice of cesarean delivery in ambiguous cases: is it influenced by risk attitude or fear of complaints and litigation? [J].
Fuglenes, Dorthe ;
Oian, Pal ;
Kristiansen, Ivar Sonbo .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 200 (01) :48.e1-48.e8
[18]   Inequities in the use of cesarean section deliveries in the world [J].
Gibbons, Luz ;
Belizan, Jose M. ;
Lauer, Jeremy A. ;
Betran, Ana P. ;
Merialdi, Mario ;
Althabe, Fernando .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (04) :331.e1-331.e19
[19]   A novel use of a classification system to audit severe maternal morbidity [J].
Homer, Caroline S. E. ;
Kurinczuk, Jennifer J. ;
Spark, Patsy ;
Brocklehurst, Peter ;
Knight, Marian .
MIDWIFERY, 2010, 26 (05) :532-536
[20]   Trends and determinants of caesarean sections births in Queensland, 1997-2006 [J].
Howell, Stuart ;
Johnston, Trisha ;
Macleod, Sue-Lynne .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 49 (06) :606-611