Analyzing and visualizing the spatial interactions between tourists and locals: A Flickr study in ten US cities

被引:62
作者
Li, Dongying [1 ]
Zhou, Xiaolu [2 ]
Wang, Mingshu [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Landscape Architecture & Urban Planning, Langford A308, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Georgia Southern Univ, Dept Geol & Geog, 68 Georgia Ave,Herty Bldg 0201, Statesboro, GA 30460 USA
[3] Dept Geog, 210 Field St,Rm 204, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Volunteered geographic information; Flickr; Tourist-local interaction; Spatial mix; Tourist hotspot; Local hotspot; ATTITUDES; SEGREGATION; FOOTPRINTS; RESIDENTS; AUSTRIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.012
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
As urban tourism becomes an indispensable part of urban dynamics, tourist attractions are increasingly woven into residents' everyday living spaces. However, the spatial patterns of, and level of mix between tourist and local attractions have remained largely unknown. Taking advantage of the recent development in volunteered geographic information, we used Flickr data to examine how tourists and locals' destinations overlap spatially. We combined a density-based spatial clustering algorithm, a dissimilarity index, spatial scan statistics, and location-based tag clouds to explore the potential spatial and social interactions between tourists and local residents in ten US cities: Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, New York City, Orlando, San Francisco, Seattle, and Washington, D.C.. At the city-level, we report the spatial distributions of visitors' and locals' destinations and compare the overall level of segregation between the two groups. Within each city, we identify the hotspots for visitors and locals and investigate the semantic content for reasons behind visiting specific places. Finally, we discuss our findings and provide implications for urban planning and tourism research.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 258
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ARXIV14037400
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010 14 INT C INF VI
[3]  
[Anonymous], P 18 INT C WORLD WID
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, KDD
[5]  
Belisle F. J., 1980, Annals of Tourism Research, V7, P83, DOI 10.1016/S0160-7383(80)80008-9
[6]  
Bojic I., 2015, EL COMP ENG WIECON E
[7]   An assessment of Public Participation GIS and Web 2.0 technologies in urban planning practice in Canela, Brazil [J].
Bugs, Geisa ;
Granell, Carlos ;
Fonts, Oscar ;
Huerta, Joaquin ;
Painho, Marco .
CITIES, 2010, 27 (03) :172-181
[8]   Identification of tourist hot spots based on social networks: A comparative analysis of European metropolises using photo-sharing services and GIS [J].
Carlos Garcia-Palomares, Juan ;
Gutierrez, Javier ;
Minguez, Carmen .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 63 :408-417
[9]   Crowdsourcing urban form and function [J].
Crooks, Andrew ;
Pfoser, Dieter ;
Jenkins, Andrew ;
Croitoru, Arie ;
Stefanidis, Anthony ;
Smith, Duncan ;
Karagiorgou, Sophia ;
Efentakis, Alexandros ;
Lamprianidis, George .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2015, 29 (05) :720-741
[10]   Rethinking social impacts of tourism research: A new research agenda [J].
Deery, Margaret ;
Jago, Leo ;
Fredline, Liz .
TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2012, 33 (01) :64-73