Should evoked potential monitoring be used in degenerative cervical spine surgery? A systematic review

被引:12
作者
Di Martino, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
Papalia, Rocco [1 ]
Caldaria, Antonio [1 ]
Torre, Guglielmo [1 ]
Denaro, Luca [3 ]
Denaro, Vincenzo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Campus Biomed Rome, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Via Alvaro Del Portillo 200, I-00128 Rome, Italy
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, SKMC, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Univ Padua, Dept Neurosurg, Padua, Italy
关键词
SSEP; MEP; IONM; Evoked potentials; Cervical spine surgery; MOTOR; SERIES;
D O I
10.1186/s10195-019-0524-4
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundIntraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) and transcranial motor evoked potential (tcMEP) monitoring are frequently used in spinal as well as spinal cord surgery for so-called intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), while the combination of these techniques is known as concomitant multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM). The aim of this review is to collect available evidence concerning use of IONM and MIOM in cervical decompression surgery in the degenerative setting and attempt to identify the best practice to be advocated.Materials and methodsA review of the PubMed and MEDLINE databases and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials was performed. Studies were included if they involved patients who underwent cervical spine decompression surgery for degenerative stenosis with use of IONM or MIOM and where sensitivity/specificity was reported.ResultsIn the identified studies, the sensitivity of SSEP was estimated to be between 22 and 100% with constant specificity of 100%. In the included studies, the sensitivity of MEP was estimated to be between 78 and 100% with specificity ranging from 83.2 to 100%.ConclusionsOn the basis of available evidence, MIOM could be a helpful tool in decompression cervical spine surgery in patients affected by degenerative spinal stenosis, since it is associated with high specificity and sensitivity for detection of intraoperative neural damage. However, evidence is still lacking regarding patient selection to identify individuals in whom monitoring is indicated.Level of evidenceIV (systematic review of studies with LOE II to IV).
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   STATISTICS NOTES - DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS-1 - SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY .3. [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6943) :1552-1552
[2]   Efficacy of Head Repositioning in Restoration of Electrophysiological Signals During Cervical Spine Procedures [J].
Appel, Shmuel ;
Korn, Akiva ;
Biron, Tali ;
Goldstein, Kobi ;
Rand, Nahshon ;
Millgram, Michael ;
Floman, Yizhar ;
Ashkenazi, Ely .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 34 (02) :174-178
[3]  
Azad TD, 2018, CLIN SPINE SURG, V31, P112, DOI [10.1097/BSD.0000000000000558, 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000628]
[4]   Is Neuromonitoring Necessary for All Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion? [J].
Badhiwala, Jetan ;
Wilson, Jefferson R. ;
Kreitz, Tyler M. ;
Hilibrand, Alan S. .
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2017, 30 (01) :1-3
[5]   CURRENT STATUS OF SPINAL-CORD MONITORING [J].
BROWN, RH ;
NASH, CL .
SPINE, 1979, 4 (06) :466-470
[6]   Cervical Spine Surgery: An Historical Perspective [J].
Denaro, Vincenzo ;
Di Martino, Alberto .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (03) :639-648
[7]  
Eager Matthew, 2011, Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol, V51, P247
[8]  
Eggspuehler A, 2007, EUR SPINE J, V16, pS209
[9]  
Epstein Nancy E, 2015, Surg Neurol Int, V6, pS154, DOI 10.4103/2152-7806.156556
[10]   Cervical disc herniation and cervical spondylosis surgically treated by Cloward procedure: A 10-year-minimum follow-up study [J].
Faldini C. ;
Leonetti D. ;
Nanni M. ;
Martino A.D. ;
Denaro L. ;
Denaro V. ;
Giannini S. .
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2010, 11 (2) :99-103