Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Secondary to Crossing Vessels-To Transpose or Not? The Robotic Experience

被引:30
|
作者
Boylu, Ugur [1 ]
Oommen, Mathew [1 ]
Lee, Benjamin R. [1 ]
Thomas, Raju [1 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
关键词
kidney; ureter; robotics; laparoscopy; cardiovascular abnormalities; LAPAROSCOPIC DISMEMBERED PYELOPLASTY; ENDOPYELOTOMY; ANGIOGRAPHY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.114
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We compared the surgical outcomes of robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in patients presenting with anterior crossing vessels with and without transposition of the crossing vessel. Materials and Methods: A total of 107 patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction underwent robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Evaluation of surgical success was based on validated pain scores, diuretic renography and imaging results, including excretory urography, computerized tomography or ultrasound. Results: Anterior crossing vessels were identified in 48 patients (44.9%) and vessels were transposed in 18 (37.5%) (group 1). No transposition was performed in 30 patients (62.5%) (group 2). Mean radiological followup was 52.9 weeks in group 1 and 65.3 weeks in group 2 (p = 0.181). Mean pain score on a scale of 10 was 0.82 in group 1 and 0.74 in group 2 (p = 0.917). A Whitaker test performed in 3 patients with persistent pain was negative. Preoperatively mean differential function on the affected side was 35.1% in group 1 and 36.9% in group 2 (p = 0.133). Half-time was calculated as a mean of 46.3 minutes in group 1 and 49.4 minutes in group 2 (p = 0.541). In groups 1 and 2 mean postoperative differential function improved to 41.1% and 40.9%, and mean half-time improved to 7.43 and 8.03 minutes, respectively (p = 0.491). A comparison of preoperative and postoperative differential function, and half-time in each group showed a statistically significant difference. The radiographic and symptomatic success rate was 100% with no open conversion and recurrence. Conclusions: Comparison of robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty outcomes revealed similar success rates in terms of the change in symptoms and renal function in patients with or without anterior crossing vessel transposition. Transposition of crossing vessel should only be performed when the anatomical relation dictates and it should be an intraoperative decision.
引用
收藏
页码:1751 / 1755
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Retroperitoneoscopic pyelotomy combined with the transposition of crossing vessels for ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Nagai, A
    Nasu, Y
    Hashimoto, H
    Tsugawa, M
    Yasui, K
    Kumon, H
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (01) : 23 - 26
  • [2] Further experience with the vascular hitch (laparoscopic transposition of lower pole crossing vessels): An alternate treatment for pediatric ureterovascular ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Gundeti, Mohan S.
    Reynolds, W. Stuart
    Duffy, Patrick G.
    Mushtaq, Imran
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (04) : 1832 - 1836
  • [3] The absence of crossing vessels in association with ureteropelvic junction obstruction detected by prenatal ultrasonography
    Ross, JH
    Kay, R
    Knipper, NS
    Streem, SB
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (03) : 973 - 975
  • [4] Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Sundaram, CP
    Grubb, RL
    Rehman, J
    Yan, Y
    Chen, C
    Landman, J
    McDougall, EM
    Clayman, RV
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (06) : 2037 - 2040
  • [5] Emerging Trends in Robotic Pyeloplasty for the Management of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Adults
    Monn, M. Francesca
    Bahler, Clinton D.
    Schneider, Eric B.
    Sundaram, Chandru P.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04) : 1352 - 1357
  • [6] Evaluation of crossing vessels in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction by means of helical CT
    Mitsumori, A
    Yasui, K
    Akaki, S
    Togami, I
    Joja, I
    Hashimoto, H
    Kumon, H
    Hiraki, Y
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2000, 20 (05) : 1383 - 1393
  • [7] Partial ureteropelvic junction obstruction managed by robotic excision and ureteropyelostomy
    Richards, Kyle A.
    Singh, Iqbal
    Hemal, Ashok K.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 16 (06) : 4932 - 4935
  • [8] Robotic surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Lee, Richard S.
    Borer, Joseph G.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2006, 16 (04) : 291 - 294
  • [9] Preliminary Experience with Laparoscopic Ureteropelvic Junction Release in the Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction
    Schuster, Tina K.
    Jacobs, Bruce L.
    Gayed, Bishoy A.
    Averch, Timothy D.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (03) : 393 - 396
  • [10] Pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: can magnetic resonance urography identify crossing vessels?
    Parikh, Kushal R.
    Hammer, Matthew R.
    Kraft, Kate H.
    Ivancic, Vesna
    Smith, Ethan A.
    Dillman, Jonathan R.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2015, 45 (12) : 1788 - 1795