Standards and export decisions: Firm-level evidence from developing countries
被引:51
|
作者:
Chen, Maggie Xiaoyang
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
George Washington Univ, Dept Econ, Washington, DC 20052 USA
George Washington Univ, Elliott Sch Int Affairs, Washington, DC 20052 USAGeorge Washington Univ, Dept Econ, Washington, DC 20052 USA
Chen, Maggie Xiaoyang
[1
,2
]
Wilson, John S.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
World Bank, Washington, DC 20433 USAGeorge Washington Univ, Dept Econ, Washington, DC 20052 USA
Wilson, John S.
[3
]
Otsuki, Tsunehiro
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Osaka Univ, Osaka Sch Int Publ Policy, Osaka, JapanGeorge Washington Univ, Dept Econ, Washington, DC 20052 USA
Otsuki, Tsunehiro
[4
]
机构:
[1] George Washington Univ, Dept Econ, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Elliott Sch Int Affairs, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[3] World Bank, Washington, DC 20433 USA
[4] Osaka Univ, Osaka Sch Int Publ Policy, Osaka, Japan
Standards and technical regulations set in importing countries have become a rising concern to exporters, especially to those in developing countries. This paper examines the importance of various types of standards in developing-country firms' export decisions. Drawn from the World Bank Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Survey database, we find that different types of standards exhibit sharply distinct relations with firms' intensive and extensive margins of exports. Quality standards are positively correlated not only with firms' average export volume across markets and products but also their export scope, measured by the number of export markets and products. A similar relationship is found between labeling requirements and export scope. Certification procedures, however, are associated with a significant decline in the number of export markets and export products. Our results suggest that different approaches should be taken to address each type of technical regulations. Not all standards need to be negotiated away to boost trade, but negotiations on certification procedures with the aim of reaching Mutual Recognition Agreements (MRAs) can help firms improve economies of scale and scope.
机构:
World Bank, Enterprise Anal Unit, DECEA, Washington, DC 20433 USA
World Bank, Enterprise Anal Unit, DECEA, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaWorld Bank, Enterprise Anal Unit, DECEA, Washington, DC 20433 USA
Amin, Mohammad
Motta, Victor
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
SKEMA Business Sch, Lille, France
Univ Cote dAzur, Nice, FranceWorld Bank, Enterprise Anal Unit, DECEA, Washington, DC 20433 USA
机构:
Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Econ, Bangkok, ThailandChulalongkorn Univ, Fac Econ, Bangkok, Thailand
Muthitacharoen, Athiphat
Samphantharak, Krislert
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Global Policy & Strategy, San Diego, CA USA
Bank Thailand, Puey Ungphakorn Inst Econ Res PIER, Bangkok, ThailandChulalongkorn Univ, Fac Econ, Bangkok, Thailand