Effect of DNA Extraction Methods and Sampling Techniques on the Apparent Structure of Cow and Sheep Rumen Microbial Communities

被引:239
作者
Henderson, Gemma [1 ]
Cox, Faith [1 ]
Kittelmann, Sandra [1 ]
Miri, Vahideh Heidarian [1 ]
Zethof, Michael [1 ]
Noel, Samantha J. [1 ,2 ]
Waghorn, Garry C. [3 ]
Janssen, Peter H. [1 ]
机构
[1] AgResearch Ltd, Palmerston North, New Zealand
[2] Massey Univ, Palmerston North, New Zealand
[3] DairyNZ, Hamilton, New Zealand
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 09期
关键词
BACTERIAL DIVERSITY; FECAL SAMPLES; DAIRY-COWS; PCR-DGGE; DIETS; ARCHAEA; PASTURE; CATTLE; DEER;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0074787
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Molecular microbial ecology techniques are widely used to study the composition of the rumen microbiota and to increase understanding of the roles they play. Therefore, sampling and DNA extraction methods that result in adequate yields of microbial DNA that also accurately represents the microbial community are crucial. Fifteen different methods were used to extract DNA from cow and sheep rumen samples. The DNA yield and quality, and its suitability for downstream PCR amplifications varied considerably, depending on the DNA extraction method used. DNA extracts from nine extraction methods that passed these first quality criteria were evaluated further by quantitative PCR enumeration of microbial marker loci. Absolute microbial numbers, determined on the same rumen samples, differed by more than 100-fold, depending on the DNA extraction method used. The apparent compositions of the archaeal, bacterial, ciliate protozoal, and fungal communities in identical rumen samples were assessed using 454 Titanium pyrosequencing. Significant differences in microbial community composition were observed between extraction methods, for example in the relative abundances of members of the phyla Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes. Microbial communities in parallel samples collected from cows by oral stomach-tubing or through a rumen fistula, and in liquid and solid rumen digesta fractions, were compared using one of the DNA extraction methods. Community representations were generally similar, regardless of the rumen sampling technique used, but significant differences in the abundances of some microbial taxa such as the Clostridiales and the Methanobrevibacter ruminantium clade were observed. The apparent microbial community composition differed between rumen sample fractions, and Prevotellaceae were most abundant in the liquid fraction. DNA extraction methods that involved phenol-chloroform extraction and mechanical lysis steps tended to be more comparable. However, comparison of data from studies in which different sampling techniques, different rumen sample fractions or different DNA extraction methods were used should be avoided.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] BASIC LOCAL ALIGNMENT SEARCH TOOL
    ALTSCHUL, SF
    GISH, W
    MILLER, W
    MYERS, EW
    LIPMAN, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1990, 215 (03) : 403 - 410
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package) version 3.6
  • [3] Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens
    Ariefdjohan, Merlin W.
    Savaiano, Dennis A.
    Nakatsu, Cindy H.
    [J]. NUTRITION JOURNAL, 2010, 9
  • [4] Influence of DNA isolation on Q-PCR-based quantification of methanogenic Archaea in biogas fermenters
    Bergmann, I.
    Mundt, K.
    Sontag, M.
    Baumstark, I.
    Nettmann, E.
    Klocke, M.
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 33 (02) : 78 - 84
  • [5] QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data
    Caporaso, J. Gregory
    Kuczynski, Justin
    Stombaugh, Jesse
    Bittinger, Kyle
    Bushman, Frederic D.
    Costello, Elizabeth K.
    Fierer, Noah
    Pena, Antonio Gonzalez
    Goodrich, Julia K.
    Gordon, Jeffrey I.
    Huttley, Gavin A.
    Kelley, Scott T.
    Knights, Dan
    Koenig, Jeremy E.
    Ley, Ruth E.
    Lozupone, Catherine A.
    McDonald, Daniel
    Muegge, Brian D.
    Pirrung, Meg
    Reeder, Jens
    Sevinsky, Joel R.
    Tumbaugh, Peter J.
    Walters, William A.
    Widmann, Jeremy
    Yatsunenko, Tanya
    Zaneveld, Jesse
    Knight, Rob
    [J]. NATURE METHODS, 2010, 7 (05) : 335 - 336
  • [6] Microbiome analysis of dairy cows fed pasture or total mixed ration diets
    de Menezes, Alexandre B.
    Lewis, Eva
    O'Donovan, Michael
    O'Neill, Brendan F.
    Clipson, Nicholas
    Doyle, Evelyn M.
    [J]. FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY, 2011, 78 (02) : 256 - 265
  • [7] High Prevalence of Methanobrevibacter smithii and Methanosphaera stadtmanae Detected in the Human Gut Using an Improved DNA Detection Protocol
    Dridi, Bedis
    Henry, Mireille
    El Khechine, Amel
    Raoult, Didier
    Drancourt, Michel
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (09):
  • [8] Next Generation Sequencing to Define Prokaryotic and Fungal Diversity in the Bovine Rumen
    Fouts, Derrick E.
    Szpakowski, Sebastian
    Purushe, Janaki
    Torralba, Manolito
    Waterman, Richard C.
    MacNeil, Michael D.
    Alexander, Leeson J.
    Nelson, Karen E.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (11):
  • [9] A comparison of rumen fluid sampled by oro-ruminal probe versus rumen fistula
    Geishauser, T
    Gitzel, A
    [J]. SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 1996, 21 (01) : 63 - 69
  • [10] Structure of the archaeal community of the rumen
    Janssen, Peter H.
    Kirs, Marek
    [J]. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 74 (12) : 3619 - 3625