Consensus plus Innovations Distributed Inference over Networks

被引:147
作者
Kar, Soummya [1 ]
Moura, Jose M. F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
SENSOR NETWORKS; STATE ESTIMATION; KALMAN-FILTER; ALGORITHMS; TOPOLOGY; QUANTIZATION; AGENTS; LINKS;
D O I
10.1109/MSP.2012.2235193
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This article presents consensus + innovations inference algorithms that intertwine consensus (local averaging among agents) and innovations (sensing and assimilation of new observations). These algorithms are of importance in many scenarios that involve cooperation and interaction among a large number of agents with no centralized coordination. The agents only communicate locally over sparse topologies and sense new observations at the same rate as they communicate. This stands in sharp contrast with other distributed inference approaches, in which interagent communications are assumed to occur at a much faster rate than agents can sense (sample) the environment so that, in between measurements, agents may iterate enough times to reach a decision-consensus before a new measurement is made and assimilated. While optimal design of distributed inference algorithms in stochastic time-varying scenarios is a hard (often intractable) problem, this article emphasizes the design of asymptotically (in time) optimal distributed inference approaches, i.e., distributed algorithms that achieve the asymptotic performance of the corresponding optimal centralized inference approach (with instantaneous access to the entire network sensed information at all times). Consensus + innovations algorithms extend consensus in nontrivial ways to mixed-scale stochastic approximation algorithms, in which the time scales (or weighting) of the consensus potential (the potential for distributed agent collaboration) and of the innovation potential (the potential for local innovations) are suitably traded for optimal performance. This article shows why this is needed and what the implications are, giving the reader pointers to new methodologies that are useful in their own right and in many other contexts. © 1991-2012 IEEE.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 109
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Dynamics and Control of Large Electric Power Systems
[2]  
Bajovic D., 2013, IEEE T SIGNAL PROCES, V63
[3]   Distributed Detection via Gaussian Running Consensus: Large Deviations Asymptotic Analysis [J].
Bajovic, Dragana ;
Jakovetic, Dusan ;
Xavier, Joao ;
Sinopoli, Bruno ;
Moura, Jose M. F. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2011, 59 (09) :4381-4396
[4]   Randomized gossip algorithms [J].
Boyd, Stephen ;
Ghosh, Arpita ;
Prabhakar, Balaji ;
Shah, Devavrat .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2006, 52 (06) :2508-2530
[5]   Asymptotic Optimality of Running Consensus in Testing Binary Hypotheses [J].
Braca, Paolo ;
Marano, Stefano ;
Matta, Vincenzo ;
Willett, Peter .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2010, 58 (02) :814-825
[6]  
Chung F., 1992, Spectral Graph Theory
[7]  
Das A. K., 2006, 2006 3rd Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (IEEE Cat. No. 06EX1523), P440, DOI 10.1109/SAHCN.2006.288500
[8]   REACHING A CONSENSUS [J].
DEGROOT, MH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1974, 69 (345) :118-121
[9]   Gossip Algorithms for Distributed Signal Processing [J].
Dimakis, Alexandros G. ;
Kar, Soummya ;
Moura, Jose M. F. ;
Rabbat, Michael G. ;
Scaglione, Anna .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2010, 98 (11) :1847-1864
[10]  
FIEDLER M, 1973, CZECH MATH J, V23, P298