Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? the perspective of patients

被引:657
作者
Macario, A [1 ]
Weinger, M
Carney, S
Kim, A
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesia H3580, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Anesthesiol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[4] San Diego Vet Affairs Healthcare Syst, San Diego, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199909000-00022
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Healthcare quality can be improved by eliciting patient preferences and customizing care to meet the needs of the patient. The goal of this study was to quantify patients' preferences for postoperative anesthesia outcomes. One hundred one patients in the preoperative clinic completed a written survey. Patients were asked to rank (order) 10 possible postoperative outcomes from their most undesirable to their least undesirable outcome. Each outcome was described in simple language. Patients were also asked to distribute $100 among the 10 outcomes, proportionally more money being allocated to the more undesirable outcomes. The dollar allocations were used to determine the relative value of each outcome. Rankings and relative value scores correlated closely (r(2) = 0.69). Patients rated from most undesirable to least undesirable (in order): vomiting, gagging on the tracheal tube, incisional pain, nausea, recall without pain, residual weakness, shivering, sore throat, and somnolence (F-test < 0.01). Implications: Although there is variability in how patients rated postoperative outcomes, avoiding nausea/vomiting, incisional pain, and gagging on the endotracheal tube was a high priority for most patients. Whether clinicians can improve the quality of anesthesia by designing anesthesia regimens that most closely meet each individual patient's preferences for clinical outcomes deserves further study.
引用
收藏
页码:652 / 658
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] WHOSE UTILITIES FOR DECISION-ANALYSIS
    BOYD, NF
    SUTHERLAND, HJ
    HEASMAN, KZ
    TRITCHLER, DL
    CUMMINGS, BJ
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1990, 10 (01) : 58 - 67
  • [2] BROWN WM, 1977, STAT BIOMEDICAL INTR
  • [3] THE PATIENTS VIEW OF ANESTHESIA IN AN AUSTRALIAN TEACHING HOSPITAL
    BURROW, BJ
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1982, 10 (01) : 20 - 24
  • [4] OUTCOMES AFTER SAME-DAY ORAL-SURGERY - A REVIEW OF 1,180 CASES AT A MAJOR TEACHING HOSPITAL
    CHYE, EPY
    YOUNG, IG
    OSBORNE, GA
    RUDKIN, GE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1993, 51 (08) : 846 - 849
  • [5] A prospective study of the impact of patient preferences on life-sustaining treatment and hospital cost
    Danis, M
    Mutran, E
    Garrett, JM
    Stearns, SC
    Slifkin, RT
    Hanson, L
    Williams, JF
    Churchhill, LR
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 24 (11) : 1811 - 1817
  • [6] INVOLVING CONSUMERS IN QUALITY OF CARE ASSESSMENT
    DAVIES, AR
    WARE, JE
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1988, 7 (01) : 33 - 48
  • [7] ANESTHESIA IN AN AUSTRALIAN PRIVATE HOSPITAL - THE CONSUMERS VIEW
    DODDS, CP
    HARDING, MI
    MORE, DG
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1985, 13 (03) : 325 - 329
  • [8] EVALUATING QUALITY OF MEDICAL CARE
    DONABEDIAN, A
    [J]. MILBANK MEMORIAL FUND QUARTERLY-HEALTH AND SOCIETY, 1966, 44 (03): : 166 - 206
  • [9] Donabedian A., 1980, EXPLORATIONS QUALITY
  • [10] Measuring patient satisfaction with anesthesia care: A review of current methodology
    Fung, D
    Cohen, MM
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 87 (05) : 1089 - 1098