Mapping seascapes of international environmental arrangements in the Coral Triangle

被引:15
作者
Fidelman, Pedro [1 ,2 ]
Ekstrom, Julia A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sunshine Coast, Sustainabil Res Ctr, Maroochydore, DC 4558, Australia
[2] James Cook Univ, ARC Ctr Excellence Coral Reef Studies, Townsville, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Climate & Energy Policy Inst, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Governance architecture; International environmental agreements; Inter-institutional coordination; Large-scale systems; Coral Triangle Initiative; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2012.02.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security (CTI), adopted recently in response to the degradation of coastal and marine environments in the Southeast Asia-Pacific's Coral Triangle, emphasises the need for using existing international and regional fora to promote implementation. Large-scale marine initiatives, including the CTI, very often must contend with a remarkably complex institutional system. This raises the question of whether and how such complexity can be conducive to marine resources management. To answer this question, this paper aims to better understand the governance context in which the CTI was established (i.e., map governance fragmentation/complexity), and explore how such a context may support the implementation of the CTI goals (i.e., examine normative interplay). To conduct this examination, it uses an objective method that allows users to view and explore institutional arrangements through a network approach. By documenting the system of existing institutions in the Coral Triangle, the study shows that the Coral Triangle governance system is illustrative of those of international environmental governance. It involves multiple policy domains. and features different institutional arrangements and variability in terms of geographical scope and main subject matter. Such a system is complex and fragmented, marked by jurisdiction and functional overlaps. The paper suggests interplay management, such as inter-institutional learning and enhancing institutional synergy, as a promising process to promote inter-institutional coordination. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:993 / 1004
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2009, COR TRIANGL IN LEAD
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, NETDRAW GRAPH VISUAL
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, ECOSYSTEM BASED MANA
  • [4] Bensted-Smith R., 2010, Comparison of Approaches to Management of Large Marine Areas
  • [5] Governance and Environmental Change in the Arctic Ocean
    Berkman, Paul Arthur
    Young, Oran R.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2009, 324 (5925) : 339 - 340
  • [6] Global Environmental Governance: Taking Stock, Moving Forward
    Biermann, Frank
    Pattberg, Philipp
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2008, 33 : 277 - 294
  • [7] Earth system governance: a research framework
    Biermann, Frank
    Betsill, Michele M.
    Gupta, Joyeeta
    Kanie, Norichika
    Lebel, Louis
    Liverman, Diana
    Schroeder, Heike
    Siebenhuener, Bernd
    Zondervan, Ruben
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2010, 10 (04) : 277 - 298
  • [8] The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis
    Biermann, Frank
    Pattberg, Philipp
    van Asselt, Harro
    Zelli, Fariborz
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2009, 9 (04) : 14 - +
  • [9] Burke L., 2011, REEFS RISK REVISITED, DOI DOI 10.1016/0022-0981(79)90136-9
  • [10] CCSBT/WCPFC, 2009, MEM UND COMM CONS SO