Estimation of floor response spectra using modified modal pushover analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Pan, Xiaolan [1 ]
Zheng, Zhi [1 ]
Wang, Zhenyu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China
[2] Harbin Inst Technol, Minist Educ, Key Lab Struct Dynam Behav & Control, Harbin 150090, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Floor response spectra; Nonstructural components; Modal pushover analysis; Nonlinear dynamic analysis; HYSTERETIC ENERGY DEMAND; SEISMIC DESIGN FORCES; NONSTRUCTURAL COMPONENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.10.024
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
A common approach to designing nonstructural components against seismic excitations involves the use of floor response spectra (FRS). FRS can be accurately computed only through a nonlinear time-history analysis of the structure subjected to a specific earthquake ground motion. However, for multi-storey structures, which are usually modeled as multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) systems, this analysis becomes computation-intensive and time-consuming and is not suitable for adopting in seismic design guidelines. An alternative method of estimating FRS on MDOF systems is presented here. The proposed method uses multiple 'generalized' or 'equivalent' single degree of freedom (ESDOF) systems to estimate FRS on a MDOF system within the context of a 'modal pushover analysis (MPA)'. This is a modified version of the previous MPA procedure as it considers the contribution of the first mode to yielding of higher modes when obtaining multiple ESDOF systems. FRS values for each mode are obtained through nonlinear dynamic analysis of each ESDOF system and then the total FRS values are calculated for the considered modes according to the SRSS combination rule. The efficiency of the modified procedure is tested by comparing FRS based on this method with results from nonlinear dynamic analyses of MDOF systems, as well as estimates based on ESDOF systems built from the traditional MPA method, for several ground motion scenarios. Three steel moment frame structures, of 3-, 9-, and 20-storey configurations, are selected for this comparison. Bias statistics that show the effectiveness of the modified method are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:472 / 487
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MODIFIED MODAL PUSHOVER ANALYSIS OF RC FRAMES
    Trogrlic, Boris
    Mihanovic, Ante
    Nikolic, Zeljana
    FIB SYMPOSIUM PRAGUE 2011: CONCRETE ENGINEERING FOR EXCELLENCE AND EFFICIENCY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2011, : 95 - 98
  • [2] Estimation of hysteretic energy demand using concepts of modal pushover analysis
    Prasanth, Tholen
    Ghosh, Siddhartha
    Collins, Kevin R.
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2008, 37 (06): : 975 - 990
  • [3] Evaluation of modal pushover analysis using generic frames
    Chintanapakdee, C
    Chopra, AK
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2003, 32 (03): : 417 - 442
  • [4] Approximate incremental dynamic analysis using the modal pushover analysis procedure
    Han, Sang Whan
    Chopra, Anil K.
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2006, 35 (15): : 1853 - 1873
  • [5] Optimal combination for modal pushover analysis by using genetic algorithm
    Shakeri, K.
    Mohebbi, M.
    World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2010, 37 : 411 - 417
  • [6] Combination coefficients for modal pushover analysis
    Cacciola, R.
    Colajanni, P.
    Potenzone, B.
    APPLICATIONS OF STATISICS AND PROBABILITY IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2007, : 227 - 228
  • [7] Applicability of Modal Pushover Analysis on Bridges
    Wei, Biao
    Zeng, Qingyuan
    Lu, Weian
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-6, 2011, 255-260 : 806 - +
  • [9] Ground motion record scaling for time history analysis using a modified modal-pushover-based procedure
    Han, Jianping
    Jia, Junguo
    Tumu Gongcheng Xuebao/China Civil Engineering Journal, 2016, 49 (08): : 36 - 44
  • [10] Modal spectra combination method for pushover analysis of special steel moment resisting frames
    Rofooei, F. R.
    Mirjalili, M. R.
    Attari, N. K. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2012, 10 (04) : 245 - 252