Crop Production, Export of Virtual Water and Water-saving Strategies in Arizona

被引:36
作者
Bae, Jinwon [1 ]
Dall'erba, Sandy [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Sch Geog & Dev, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Reg Econ Applicat Lab, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
input-output analysis; Virtual water flow; Agricultural water saving; INPUT-OUTPUT-ANALYSIS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; TRADE; RESOURCES; FOOTPRINT; CALIFORNIA; TRANSFERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.018
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Growing world population and the uncertain hazards that accompany climate change put an increasing pressure on the management and sustainability of scarce environmental resources, notably water. In spite of its water scarcity, the state of Arizona permits as much as 73% of its water to be consumed by a single sector, crop production. Since 79% of such crop production is not consumed in Arizona, it corresponds to exporting up to 67% of the water available in the state to the rest of the country and abroad. It has certain and glooming consequences on the availability of water for a state expected to see its population grow and its climate get drier. Based on input-output techniques, we simulate three scenarios aiming at saving 19% of the water available, a figure set by the first of them based on improving the efficiency of the current irrigation system. The same savings could also be reached by a twenty-seven-fold increase in the price of water or a 19.5% reduction in crop exports. Estimates indicate that the least costly solution is a more efficient irrigation system while export reduction is the second-best choice.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 156
页数:9
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Duration analysis of adoption of drip irrigation technology in southeastern Spain [J].
Alcon, Francisco ;
Dolores de Miguel, Maria ;
Burton, Michael .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2011, 78 (06) :991-1001
[2]  
ALLAN JA, 1994, WATER IN THE ARAB WORLD, P65
[3]   Virtual water: A strategic resource global solutions to regional deficits [J].
Allan, JA .
GROUND WATER, 1998, 36 (04) :545-546
[4]  
Allan T., 1993, Proceedings of the conference on priorities for water resources allocation and management. Natural Resources and Engineering Advisers Conference, Southampton, July 1992., P13
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Arizona State and County Population Projections, 2012-2050: Methodology Report, P1
[6]  
CAP, 2009, 2009 2010 WAT RAT SC
[7]   Multiregional Input-Output Model for the Evaluation of Spanish Water Flows [J].
Cazcarro, Ignacio ;
Duarte, Rosa ;
Sanchez Choliz, Julio .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (21) :12275-12283
[8]   The effects of climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River basin [J].
Christensen, NS ;
Wood, AW ;
Voisin, N ;
Lettenmaier, DP ;
Palmer, RN .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2004, 62 (1-3) :337-363
[9]   Agricultural virtual water flows within the United States [J].
Dang, Qian ;
Lin, Xiaowen ;
Konar, Megan .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2015, 51 (02) :973-986
[10]  
Dasberg S., 1999, Drip Irrigation