Hip arthroplasty patients benefit from accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation - A quasi-experimental study of 98 patients

被引:43
作者
Larsen, Kristian [1 ]
Hansen, Torben Baek [1 ]
Soballe, Kjeld [2 ]
机构
[1] Holstebro Reg Hosp, Orthoped Res Unit, Holstebro, Denmark
[2] Univ Aarhus, Dept Orthoped, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1080/17453670810016632
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and purpose More than 6,500 hip arthroplasties were performed in Denmark in 2005. Accelerated perioperative interventions are currently implemented, and the length of stay is thereby reduced. An increase in postoperative health-related quality-of- life (HRQOL) has been observed for hip patients after accelerated perioperative procedures compared to standard procedures. However, no studies have used HRQOL as a primary outcome. We therefore performed a before-after trial to investigate whether HRQOL would be improved postoperatively in hip arthroplasty patients undergoing accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation intervention compared to those undergoing current intervention. Patients and methods 98 elective primary hip arthroplasty patients underwent either a standard procedure or an accelerated perioperative procedure (n = 48 and n = 50, respectively). Primary outcome was difference in HRQOL measured with EQ-5D, which measures HRQOL in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) at the 3-month follow-up visit. Results HRQOL was markedly improved in both groups. A significant difference in HRQOL at follow-up of 0.08 (95% CI: 0.01-0.15) in favor of the patients who received the accelerated intervention was observed (p = 0.02). Interpretation Hip arthroplasty patients benefit postoperatively from accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation procedures, with an HRQOL that is approximately 10% higher than that of patients receiving standard procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:624 / 630
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2003, EPIDATA 3 1 COMPREHE
  • [2] Joint recovery programme versus usual care - An economic evaluation of a clinical pathway for joint replacement surgery
    Brunenberg, DE
    van Steyn, MJ
    Sluimer, JC
    Bekebrede, LL
    Bulstra, SK
    Joore, MA
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2005, 43 (10) : 1018 - 1026
  • [3] *CTR EV HLTH TECHN, 2006, EV PAT PATH PAT UND
  • [4] *DAN ORTH SOC, 2001, GUID PRIM HIP ARTHR
  • [5] *DAN ORTH SOC, 2004, GUID KNEE ARTHR PREL
  • [6] Dowsey MM, 1999, MED J AUSTRALIA, V170, P59
  • [7] Reliability and validity of the EnroQol in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee
    Fransen, M
    Edmonds, J
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 1999, 38 (09) : 807 - 813
  • [8] Husted Henrik, 2006, Ugeskr Laeger, V168, P276
  • [9] Husted Henrik, 2004, Ugeskr Laeger, V166, P3194
  • [10] Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery
    Kehlet, H
    Dahl, JB
    [J]. LANCET, 2003, 362 (9399) : 1921 - 1928