Alternative cropping systems and optimized management practices for saving groundwater and enhancing economic and environmental sustainability

被引:2
|
作者
Rathore, Vijay Singh [1 ]
Nathawat, Narayan Singh [1 ]
Bhardwaj, Seema [1 ]
Yadav, Bhagirath Mal [1 ]
Santra, Priyabrata [2 ]
Kumar, Mahesh [2 ]
Shekhawat, Ravindra Singh [1 ]
Reager, Madan Lal [3 ]
Yadav, Shish Ram [3 ]
Lal, Banwari [4 ]
Yadava, Narendra Dev [1 ]
Singh, Jai Prakash [2 ]
Kumar, Praveen [2 ]
Bhaskar, Suryanarayan [5 ]
Yadav, Om Parkash [2 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Cent Arid Zone Res Inst, Reg Res Stn, Bikaner 334004, India
[2] ICAR Cent Arid Zone Res Inst, Jodhpur 342003, Rajasthan, India
[3] SK Rajasthan Agr Univ, Bikaner 334006, India
[4] ICAR Indian Inst Pulses Res, Arid Pulses Res Ctr, Bikaner 334004, India
[5] Indian Council Agr Res, Div Nat Resource Management, New Delhi 110012, India
关键词
Alternative cropping system; Irrigation water saving; Multi-objectives decision; Resource-use efficiency; Global warming potential; Eco-efficiency index; SOIL PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES; WATER-USE EFFICIENCY; ORGANIC AMENDMENTS; DEEP TILLAGE; FARMYARD MANURE; ENERGY-USE; RICE; YIELD; IRRIGATION; FERTILIZER;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107840
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Rapid decline in groundwater table due to excessive withdrawal of water for irrigation has been posing a serious threat to sustainable agricultural production in hot arid region of India. Alternative cropping systems having low irrigation requirement have been proposed to resolve unsustainable groundwater use but trade-off with other dimensions such as yield, profitability, and environmental impacts is not well-documented. An integrated analysis of amount of groundwater use, productivity, profitability, resource-use efficiency (RUE), and environmental impacts of three cluster bean-based cropping systems [conventional cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) (CB-W), and two alternative cropping systems, namely cluster bean-Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) (CB-IM) and cluster bean-blond psyllium (Plantago ovata) (CB-BP)] under different soil management practices [two tillage types, i.e., conventional (CT), and deep tillage (DT); and three farmyard manure (FYM) application rates, i.e., 0, 5, 10 Mg ha(-1)] was carried out. Based on a three-year field experiment, compared to conventional CB-W, alternative cropping systems produced 28.6-47.4 % lower seed yield, but enhanced economic returns (7.6-31.1 %), while reduced amount of irrigation (- 27.9 to - 37.2 %), energy (- 22.4 to - 37.0 %), and nutrient (- 17.4 to - 46.1 %) used, global warming potential (- 20.2 to - 45.9 %) and greenhouse gas intensity (- 27.3 to - 57.7 %). Alternative cropping systems saved 1.87-2.50 x 10(3) m(3) per year per hectare of groundwater than conventional cropping systems. Soil management practices influenced agro-economic and environmental dimensions of cropping systems. Deep tillage (DT) enhanced yield (14.0 %), economic profit (18.8 %), RUE (13.2 %, 13.8 % and 8.5 % for nutrient, water and energy use efficiency, respectively). Addition of FYM increased yield (up to 23.0 %), economic net return (up to 21.8 %), RUE (up to 22.7 %, 16.5 %, 91.0 % in water, energy and nutrient use efficiency), and reduced global warming potential (up to - 7.9 %). The CB-BP cropping system with DT and FYM addition offered the best balance of yield, profit, saving of irrigation water, energy and nutrient, while minimizing GWP. This study provides empirical evidence of the opportunities for alternative cropping systems which balance the multiple objectives of sustainable groundwater use, farmer profitability and environmental sustainability for arid region of India. The results have direct implications for sustainable utilization of underground water for similar regions of the world facing water shortage.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of conservation agriculture and weed management on carbon footprint, energy efficiency, and sustainability in maize-wheat cropping systems
    Kumar, Sachin
    Rana, Surinder Singh
    Abdelrahman, Kamal
    Uddin, Md Galal
    Fnais, Mohammed S.
    Abioui, Mohamed
    ENERGY, 2024, 309
  • [22] AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF CONVENTIONAL AND ALTERNATIVE BIOENERGY CROPPING SYSTEMS PROMOTING BIOMASS PRODUCTIVITY
    Kervroedan, Lea
    Houben, David
    Guidet, Julien
    Denier, Julia
    Dulaurent, Anne-Maimiti
    Marraccini, Elisa
    Deligey, Amandine
    Journel, Charlotte
    Lamerre, Justine
    Faucon, Michel-Pierre
    FRONTIERS OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 9 (02) : 284 - 294
  • [23] Techno-economic and environmental assessment of different rice-based cropping systems in an inceptisol of West Bengal, India
    Ray, Krishnendu
    Hasan, Sayed Sorful
    Goswami, Rupak
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 205 : 350 - 363
  • [24] Evaluating the Impact of Alternative Cropping Systems on Groundwater Consumption and Nitrate Leaching in the Piedmont Area of the North China Plain
    Liu, Meiying
    Min, Leilei
    Shen, Yanjun
    Wu, Lin
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2020, 10 (11):
  • [25] Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from optimized and alternative cereal cropping systems on the North China Plain: A two-year field study
    Gao, Bing
    Ju, Xiaotang
    Su, Fang
    Meng, Qingfeng
    Oenema, Oene
    Christie, Peter
    Chen, Xinping
    Zhang, Fusuo
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 472 : 112 - 124
  • [26] Determining the role of land resource, cropping and management practices in soil organic carbon status of rice-based cropping systems
    Siddique, Md. Noor E. Alam
    de Bruyn, Lisa A. Lobry
    Osanai, Yui
    Guppy, Chris N.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 344
  • [27] Measuring eco-efficiency of rice cropping systems in Iran: An integrated economic and environmental approach
    Kouchaki-Penchah, Hamed
    Alizadeh, Mohammad Reza
    Aghamolki, Mohammad Taghi Karbalaei
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2023, 57
  • [28] Weed management in wide-row cropping systems: a review of current practices and risks for Australian farming systems
    Peltzer, S. C.
    Hashem, A.
    Osten, V. A.
    Gupta, M. L.
    Diggle, A. J.
    Riethmuller, G. P.
    Douglas, A.
    Moore, J. M.
    Koetz, E. A.
    CROP & PASTURE SCIENCE, 2009, 60 (05): : 395 - 406
  • [29] An ecological, environmental, and economic indicators-based approach towards enhancing sustainability in water and nutrient use for passion fruit cultivation in Colombia
    Polo-Murcia, Sonia Mercedes
    Chaali, Nesrine
    Jaramillo-Barrios, Camilo Ignacio
    Ouazaa, Sofiane
    Polo, Victor Javier
    Carvajal, John Edisson Calderon
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS, 2025, 26
  • [30] Life cycle environmental and economic sustainability of Stirling engine micro-CHP systems
    Stamford, Laurence
    Greening, Benjamin
    Azapagic, Adisa
    ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 6 (06) : 1119 - 1138