Contrasting sexual selection on males and females in a role-reversed swarming dance fly, Rhamphomyia longicauda Loew (Diptera: Empididae)

被引:34
作者
Bussiere, L. F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gwynne, D. T. [1 ]
Brooks, R. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Biol Grp, Mississauga, ON, Canada
[2] Univ New S Wales, Evolut & Ecol Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ New S Wales, Sch Biol Earth & Environm Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
assortative mating; courtship feeding; female choice; male choice; ornaments; sex role reversal; sexual competition; swarming behaviour;
D O I
10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01580.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Although there are several hypotheses for sex-specific ornamentation, few studies have measured selection in both sexes. We compare sexual selection in male and female dance flies, Rhamphomyia longicauda (Diptera: Empididae). Swarming females display size-enhancing abdominal sacs, enlarged wings and decorated tibiae, and compete for nuptial gifts provided by males. Males preferentially approach large females, but the nature of selection and whether it is sex-specific are unknown. We found contrasting sexual selection for mating success on structures shared by males and females. In females, long wings and short tibiae were favoured, whereas males with short wings and long tibiae had a mating advantage. There was no assortative mating. Females occupying potentially advantageous swarm positions were large and, in contrast to selection for mating success, tended to have larger tibiae than those of rivals. We discuss our findings in the context of both the mating biology of dance flies, and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in general.
引用
收藏
页码:1683 / 1691
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
APPOLONIO M, 1989, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V25, P89
[2]   Ornamentation predicts reproductive success in female pipefish [J].
Berglund, A ;
Rosenqvist, G ;
Bernet, P .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1997, 40 (03) :145-150
[3]  
Blanckenhorn WU, 1999, EVOLUTION, V53, P286, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05354.x
[4]   Measuring nonlinear selection [J].
Blows, MW ;
Brooks, R .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2003, 162 (06) :815-820
[5]   The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence [J].
Bonduriansky, R .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2001, 76 (03) :305-339
[6]   Sexual conflict and indirect benefits [J].
Cameron, E ;
Day, T ;
Rowe, L .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2003, 16 (05) :1055-1060
[7]   Sexual conflict [J].
Chapman, T ;
Arnqvist, G ;
Bangham, J ;
Rowe, L .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2003, 18 (01) :41-47
[8]   Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation? [J].
Chenoweth, SF ;
Doughty, P ;
Kokko, H .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2006, 9 (02) :179-184
[9]   Contrasting mutual sexual selection on homologous signal traits in Drosophila serrata [J].
Chenoweth, SF ;
Blows, MW .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2005, 165 (02) :281-289
[10]  
Conner JK, 1996, ETHOL ECOL EVOL, V8, P387