The role of advanced glycation end-products and their receptor on outcome in heart failure patients with preserved and reduced ejection fraction

被引:50
|
作者
Willemsen, Suzan
Hartog, Jasper W. L.
van Veldhuisen, Dirk J.
van der Meer, Peter
Roze, Joline F.
Jaarsma, Tiny [2 ]
Schalkwijk, Casper [3 ]
van der Horst, Iwan C. C.
Hillege, Hans L.
Voors, Adriaan A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Cardiol, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Linkoping Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, S-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[3] Maastricht Univ, Dept Med, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
HUMAN PLASMA-PROTEIN; SOLUBLE RECEPTOR; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE; PENTOSIDINE; DESIGN; RAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2012.07.027
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are increased in patients with heart failure (HF). We studied the predictive value of plasma AGEs N-E-(carboxymethyl) lysine (CML), pentosidine, and the soluble form of its receptor (sRAGE) in a large HF population. Methods In 580 patients hospitalized with HF, plasma AGEs were measured before discharge when patients were clinically stable. Patients were followed for a period of 18 months. Primary end point was a composite of death and HF admissions. CML was determined by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry, pentosidine by high-performance liquid chromatography and sRAGE by sequential sandwich immunoassay. Results Mean age was 71 +/- 11 years, 62% were men, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.32 +/- 0.14. At baseline, mean CML level was 2.16 +/- 0.73 mu mol/L, median pentosidine was 0.043 (0.030-0.074) mu mol/L, and median sRAGE level was 2.92 (1.90-4.59) ng/mL. CML and pentosidine levels were independently related to the composite end-point (HR, 1.20 per SD; 95% CI, 1.05-1.37; P = .01 and HR, 1.15 per SD; 95% CI, 1.00-1.31; P = .045, respectively) and HF hospitalization (HR, 1.27 per SD; 95% CI, 1.10-1.48; P = .001 and HR, 1.27 per SD; 95% CI, 1.10-1.47; P = .001, respectively). Furthermore, CML levels were independently related to increased mortality (P = .006). Whereas sRAGE levels were univariately predictive for outcome, in multivariate models sRAGE did not reach statistical significance. Discussion In HF patients, both CML and pentosidine predict HF hospitalization and the combined primary end-point (mortality or HF-hospitalization), whereas sRAGE did not predict events. In addition, CML was significantly and independently associated with a higher risk for mortality. (Am Heart J 2012;164:742-749.e3.)
引用
收藏
页码:742 / U146
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] BIOMARKER PROFILES IN HEART FAILURE PATIENTS WITH A PRESERVED AND REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION
    Tromp, Jasper
    Klip, IJsbrand
    Meyer, Sven
    De Boer, Rudolf
    Jaarsma, Tiny
    Hillege, Hans
    van Veldhuisen, Dirk
    Voors, Adriaan
    Vandermeer, Peter
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 65 (10) : A991 - A991
  • [42] Reduced Myocardial Flow in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Srivaratharajah, Kajenny
    Coutinho, Thais
    deKemp, Robert
    Liu, Peter
    Haddad, Haissam
    Stadnick, Ellamae
    Davies, Ross A.
    Chih, Sharon
    Dwivedi, Girish
    Guo, Ann
    Wells, George A.
    Bernick, Jordan
    Beanlands, Robert
    Mielniczuk, Lisa M.
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2016, 9 (07)
  • [43] Role of Aldosterone Receptor Antagonists in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Marrs, Joel C.
    Anderson, Sarah L.
    Gabriel, Christian
    CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-THERAPEUTICS, 2018, 10
  • [44] Secondary valve regurgitation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction, and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
    Bartko, Philipp E.
    Hulsmann, Martin
    Hung, Judy
    Pavo, Noemi
    Levine, Robert A.
    Pibarot, Philippe
    Vahanian, Alec
    Stone, Gregg W.
    Goliasch, Georg
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (29) : 2799 - +
  • [45] Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A precursor of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction or a distinct syndrome?
    Miani, Daniela
    Badano, Luigi P.
    De Biaggio, Paola
    Albanese, Maria Cecilia
    Ghidina, Marco
    Proclemer, Alessandro
    Fioretti, Paolo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 149 (01) : 139 - 140
  • [46] Predictors of Survival Outcome in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Zhang, Sherry
    Clopton, Paul
    Schimmel, Melanee
    Zamani, Payman
    Greenberg, Barry
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2016, 22 (08) : S72 - S72
  • [47] Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction
    Tufaro, C.
    Duca, F.
    Mascherbauer, J.
    Marzluf, B.
    Binder, T.
    Lang, I.
    Bonderman, D.
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2013, 125 : S69 - S69
  • [48] RENAL AGEING AND GLYCATION: IMPLICATION OF RECEPTOR FOR ADVANCED GLYCATION END-PRODUCTS
    Tessier, Thibault
    Quersin, Valentine
    Gnemmi, Viviane
    Delguste, Florian
    Daroux, Maite
    Tessier, Frederic
    Boulanger, Eric
    Frimat, Marie
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 32
  • [49] Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction
    Tufaro, C.
    Duca, F.
    Mascherbauer, J.
    Marzluf, B.
    Binder, T.
    Lang, I.
    Lang, D.
    Bonderman, D.
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2013, 125 (19-20) : 660 - 660
  • [50] Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction
    Tufaro, C.
    Mascherbauer, J.
    Marzluf, B. A.
    Binder, T.
    Lang, I. M.
    Bonderman, D.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 : 460 - 461